Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"

⁨290⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨cypherpunks@lemmy.ml⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/14f5a0b4-82b6-498d-a689-36c2824dd296.png

cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/38830374

screenshot of text “Imagine appearing for a job interview and, without saying a single word, being told that you are not getting the role because your face didn’t fit. You would assume discrimination, and might even contemplate litigation. But what if bias was not the reason? What if your face gave genuinely useful clues about your probable performance at work? That question is at the heart of a recent research”

[…]

screenshot of text “a shorter one. Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic than processes which reward, say, educational attainment. Kelly Shue of the Yale School of Management, one of the new paper’s authors, says they are now looking at whether AI facial analysis can give lenders useful clues about a person’s propensity to repay loans. For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing.”

tweet

economist article

archive.is paywall bypass

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The Economist is generally a pretty good news source, but I thought this article was subpar.

    Irrespective of whether this facial evaluation algorithm works or not, as things stand today, it is pointless to discuss its use in the context of meritocracy. A regime founded upon the rejection of personal responsibility, corruption and criminality makes such discussions irrelevant (algorithm or no algorithm).

    At the risk of sounding like an accelerationist, I can’t get rid of the feeling that the regime members are really busy doing their best to make a new metaphorical rope.

    source
    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The Economist is generally a pretty good news source,

      Gotta be drinking the pseudo-science sauce to believe this.

      source
      • Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Literally promoting phrenology.

        That’s why I said this article was subpar. And I even commented on this in pretty harsh terms:

        the regime members are really busy doing their best to make a new metaphorical rope

        I don’t agree with a lot of what they say, but I don’t believe they are malicious, at least to the extent that many American news sources are.

        source
      • Maeve@kbin.earth ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Plus the post filled with buzzwords that superficially sound smart strung together in a way that say nothing of value.

        source
  • KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Bro has the brainpan of a stagecoach tilter

    source
  • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think Lenin (for all his problems), had a good criticism of the economist though I can’t find a great source for it

    source
    • Postimo@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires, is pursuing a very instructive line in relation to the war.

      www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/…/01c.htm

      For all his problems??

      source
  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Disturbing. What is the proposed mechanism here? Or is it unknown?

    source
    • AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      They just use the buzzword “AI”, but in reality it’s probably going to be a machine learning algorithm.

      Take the dataset, split out the groups of people you do/don’t want to hire based on whatever criteria, train the model to be more likely to pick faces with characteristics from the “do hire” group, and less likely to pick those from the “don’t hire” group.

      Then, use it on real people, and it will provide similar outcomes based on faces.

      source
      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        What I meant was, what is the mechanism that supposedly connects facial features to job performance?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is that…an AI generated image?

    source