Submitted 13 hours ago by SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to [deleted]
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/26d15d77-6ac9-4bfe-abc8-76962438b6aa.webp
Yep, as the joke suggests:
Yey people, even Science Communicators like Hank Green on YouTube have been making claims like this. In a recent video on his personal channel he claimed “AI” will only get better from here. On Sci Show he claimed GPT could compete in the Maths Olympiad.
Hank Green is spreading misinformation.
I find it weird you’re criticizing Hank Green in your comment but use 2 links that don’t directly reference him at all and in fact the 2nd link uses AI generated art and summaries of the article. Hank Green has had a varied and nuanced take on AI that largely lands on it being a negative for society
Here’s him calling it a bubble: youtu.be/Q0TpWitfxPk
Him saying AI generated videos are bad: youtu.be/Vz0oQ0v0W10
Talking about AI datacenters being a problem: youtu.be/39YO-0HBKtA
All within the past 2 months
He’s got another one explaining how he moved his stock specifically to hedge against the collapse of the US economy.
I gave the specific statements that I’m saying are incorrect and provided evidence.
That you find the criticism of a science communicator for being inaccurate “weird” is neither here nor there. Nor is it my problem.
I wrote a comment along these lines, he brought up “agents” in that SciShow episode without directly saying the word, and modern agents are really just a bunch of scripts tied together with an LLM. It’s not that complicated, and they absolutely suck at performing tasks that aren’t narrowly defined. Like you can’t throw it at some issues on GitHub and expect it to actually come up with solutions. People have tried that and the success rates are absurdly low.
SciShow can be incredibly sloppy at times. They had this episode about knitting a while back and lots of knitters basically fired back with “…did you guys try to talk to knitters about this?”
Hank Green seems really affable, it’s hard not to like him (knowing very little about him) but SciShow really needs more rigorous fact checking.
You don’t need to cheat when the bar association decides to be lazy and use AI to write the exam itself.
If only she’d laid down her guns.
“oh sorry, were you not happy with the response?”
That’s not how the bar works.
Although it might be in the future if some states (California) can’t get their bar finances together.
Fair punishment if they didn’t want to be sentenced to death shouldn’t have broken the law. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. /s
I wonder who wins ChatGPT prosecutor or ChatGPT attorney. It’s definitely ChatGPT though.
Somehow they’ll both lose.
Whoever wins, we all lose
Shit is going to get really bad when a ton of medical professionals have no idea how to do major parts of their jobs because they got ChatGPT to do it. I guess that we'll have to wait and see what happens.
There’s some concern, and no doubt LLMs will have an influence, but I don’t think it’s going to be anything major or any different than the C doctors we have now. Don’t underestimate people’s desire to learn and excel on their own and the prestige of institutions in maintaining their academic standards.
“Rosenberg! That guy could defend an innocent man all the way to death row.” - GTA Vice City
Skill issue, I managed to get their entire family locked up for 20 years but them only for 5
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
You’re absolutely right to feel frustrated about the sentence. What started as a simple parking ticket fine has escalated into a public and live televised execution, and that’s on me. Thanks for sticking with it through this journey. Your feedback is completely fair and I will try to give more legally correct and relevant answers in the future.
bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
🤣🤣😂😂
RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 5 hours ago
.