Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

If you are paying to use "AI", who are you paying and what are your regular usecases?

⁨51⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨nostupidquestions@lemmy.world⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world ⁨25⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

    Currently paying for a chatbot program similar to character AI, but primarily marketed for sexual content. Started supporting it as a fun single-developer app and now I find it a pretty useful writing tool to bounce around with ideas.

    I’m trialing writing and grammar apps because I have mild dyslexia, but haven’t found any paid apps that work much better than just chucking writing into ChatGPT and asking it to find the mistakes. The streamlined UI is the only benefit I’ve found so far. And one, I think called Pro Writing Aid, kept crashing my writing app, Scrivener, whenever I tried to use it.

    source
  • muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    I pay OpenRouter they give me access to pretty much all models from all providers at the market rate per token.

    I have it hooked up to openwebui which I use for finding almost all information as it had a searxng tool to search for things.

    I also use KiloCode its an agentic code editor for vscodium.

    source
  • fubarx@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I pay for Cursor, OpenAI, and Anthropic. I was paying for Google Gemini as well, but it was returning too many errors so I canceled it. I also pay for Google office, Microsoft office, and Adobe subscriptions. They inject their own AI into their services, but I end up ignoring them or turning them off.

    Mostly use it for coding in Cursor, but occasionally for research into the state of AI and to make MCP extensions. It’s been worth the investment so far, given how much more of the mundane coding tasks get done by supervising it. I also had it update a Wordpress theme because I had no interest in learning the innards.

    I never let them loose in ‘agentic’ mode, as they inevitably destroy all the work. I can run decent-sized models locally through lmstudio and Cline, but they’re much slower than just using Cursor and a cloud model.

    Outside coding, the only usable one I’ve found is Adobe Firefly, accessed inside Photoshop (to remove material) and Illustrator (to generate simple SVGs and icons from prompts).

    Every single other one, when I’ve put it to a non-coding use has been a pile of slop. If all LLMs go away tomorrow, the only one I’ll miss is the Adobe SVG creator.

    source
  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Paying

    nothing

    Uses:

    When I have a stupid, detailed idea I put it into my local stable diffusion.

    I try to use Claude for simple tasks and “I can’t quite find this solution”, it is often wrong or needs re work, but it feels like reaching out to a colleague for my personal projects.

    I use the Google meet assistant when I stopped paying attention and the topic is staring to feel relevant.

    I use the ai search summary to do further searches with refined search terms.

    I listen to AI generated music from time to time; but I was doing it before the LLM craze went nuts, with dadabots’ covers of krallice and meshuggah

    source
  • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I paid for several, to test features and see if there is value. There is little value in paying, close to zero. The difference between the best models and the best free ones are miniscule. We are hitting a plateau now, with diminishing returns. Talking with AI is a nice UX feature, and is mostly paid, but Qwen has this for free.

    Images and video generation is not useful. Coding is slightly useful in very specific cases, but mostly useless. It gives a false sense of fast progress. In the long term it harms productivity. So it works for simple proof of concepts and inspiration/exploring solutions. If you are a junior in a language or software development, avoid it. Otherwise the road to becoming a senior will be long and hard.

    The most useful cases is “creativity”, exploring ideas, and inspiration. And getting started with something where you don’t know where to begin. If I want to know something about a topic, I find it as a useful and untrustworthy starting point, nothing can be trusted from AI, but it can introduce you to subjects so that you know what to look for. It is useful for exploring ideas and brainstorming.

    So don’t pay, just use the free ones. There is low value in paying. If you have a PC with a mid/high end GPU you can install Jan.ai for free and use models locally also.

    I currently use Mistral and Qwen mostly. I still have a subscription to Mistral, and am waiting for it to run out.

    source
    • hisao@ani.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Is there anything as good as vscode-copilot for free models? I mean, integrating the process of querying models with actually generating and applying diffs to the files in project, etc.

      source
      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I understand vscode is free, and can connect to free AI backends. I haven’t tried yet.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Harvey656@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I used to pay for sudden, then after that udio. Super cool for making theme songs for dnd, not much real use elsewhere outside goofy haha ai songs and pathetic attempts at gaming the Spotify system. They just… don’t update the models fast enough, I’m still waiting on udio 2.0, it’s fallen behind sudo at this point, which is mildly annoying, but I also don’t care enough beyond that so ehh.

    It’s also a rights nightmare, which the world seems to just be ignoring. On one hand any chump written can get a song to their lyrics which is cool and I have definitely done before, on the other… it’s all quite fake, and sounds fake too. Which is why I don’t pay for it anymore.

    I also tried replit for the first time yesterday just to see what it’s all about and it straight up made a frickin video game… vibe coding is getting scary.

    source
  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Claude Code Jetbrains AI Open Router

    The usual Dev work. Claude is primary. Jetbrains is on the fence but can be nice for autocompletes and backup. OpenRouter is for API/script usages.

    source
  • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m using openrouter.ai which is a service that allows the use of a wide range of models and you can easily switch between them on the fly.

    Besides the major players I can also use cloud hosted instances of open models. These are often incredibly cheap and and you can select the ones that don’t use your data for training.

    Typical use cases include language learning and copilot stuff for programming.

    source
  • hisao@ani.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m still on my free month of full-featured Copilot and I’m considering subscribing after it ends (10$/month). Mostly coding, bash scripting.

    source
  • shadejinx@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I am paying for Cursor, which can use various models to help with software development. I use the AI to help me create design documents for software ideas I have and use those design documents to guide it in the development of that code. I’ve tried free models on my own hardware and they don’t come close, mostly because I don’t have a spare $5k for the right GPUs.

    source