🏹🏹🏹

Comments

• squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Image: Bad AI.

  Text: Bad AI.

  Source: Bad AI.

  Neither the name of the effect nor the story turn up any results on google.

  This is not a science meme, but instead a “My first AI meme”.

  source

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Image: Bad AI (true)

    Text: I’ll bet it’s written by a human.

    Source: It’s a joke!

    See other comments if you missed it

    source
  • sqgl@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You missed the pun.

    source

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Fair.

      source
  • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Lemmy users not crying about AI challenge: impossible

    source
• itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I am astounded how many commenters don’t seem to get the pun

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    It got reports for it. 🥹

    source
• mitch@piefed.mitch.science ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  AI photography is so stupid. That target's got legs. Handsome ones, too.

  source

  • smeg@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Looks realistic to me!

    Image

    source
  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Surely it’d be easy to just find an actual stock photo to use here. But it doesn’t matter because the background just needed to be Whatever.

    That write-up is well worth the read.

    source

    • memfree@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      On your advice, I read it. Good essay. Yes, the image is Whatever, but the creative part for this post was the pun, so I still gave it an upvote because I haven’t heard it death.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Saleh@feddit.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Also they all hold the bows completely wrong.

    Angled arm, turned the wrong side, wtf?

    source
  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Nah, wood is expensive with the tariffs and all. That’s just the new range staffer holding the target.

    source

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s the intern not a staffer. Kind of you to assume they are people.

      source
• xcutie@linux.community ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

  So bad that it is good again.

  source
• psycho_driver@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m still deciding if the payoff was worth the buildup.

  source
• FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Am I missing a joke?

  source

  • TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Placebo <=> plus c bow

    source

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      ohh, tanks!

      source
  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The joke is they failed to isolate the variable

    source
• saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Foreground guy just drawing across range.

  source

  • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think he’s going for the live target holding a target.

    source
  • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Good thing none of them exist.

    source
• Emi@ani.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Placebo hellowa drug.

  source

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yeah, so much so that people believe this meme is reality, even though google turns up not a single result for “plus c bow effect” that has anything to do with archery. Neither does any google search on the story.

    The whole post is placebo, aka pure AI slop.

    source
• ryedaft@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  If the second group performed “far better” team the first group then this isn’t regression to the mean, is it? I would expect the gap to be much less or even eliminated but for the Plus C Bow group to do much better there should be something else at play, right?

  source

  • tetris11@feddit.uk ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yeah, plus the selection process was weird. Any gains attributed to the plus-C bow group just throws question to the initial rankings.

    They should have done a crossover trial, where group A is a random selection of archers initially getting no C bows, and then later getting them, and vice versa for group B. Paired t-tests, y’all!

    source

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Yeah, but the meme is a joke about how you can prove anything with regression to the mean. If all archers are equally good and we test them we would get varying results. If we then split them on performance and perform an intervention and test again then the “poor performing” group will do much better. Because it’s just random noise.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• alekwithak@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  😠

  source
• lol_idk@piefed.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It works!

  source