Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data

Comments

• makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Was going to read this article, then realised I’m a man.

  source
• Alexstarfire@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m reading right now. Ohh, you mean books? I plead the fifth.

  source

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The fifth what?

    source

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      THE FIFTH!!!

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Akasazh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Tl:dr?

  source
• whybird@aus.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  @maniacalmanicmania TL;DR

  ;)

  source
• Ilandar@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  The main thing is the little black lines – the “confidence interval” – a statistical measure of uncertainty that can be used when showing the average value of data from a survey (or other type of research).

  And what this means, which I have confirmed with the ABS, is that the reading rates are statistically the same for males and females within all generations with the exception of gen X.

  Is this correct? I haven’t studied statistics since high school so I am completely clueless, but it doesn’t make sense based on my rudimentary understanding of what a confidence interval is supposed to do. The confidence intervals overlap, but they are not identical. Doesn’t that mean that reading rates could be statistically the same, but not that they are statistically the same?

  Anyway, I also found it interesting that men read more magazines than women now too, considering it was historically the other way around and that many men actually believed its existence as a societal norm was an example of their superior rational minds.

  source

  • protist@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yes, it means could be the same, not are the same.

    source

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      It does mean they are confident that the rates are different for men and women in Gen X

      Umm, surely not? If the confidence intervals overlap it means that they are not confident that the rates are different, doesn’t it? Of course, it also does not mean that they can say they are confident that the reading rates are the same.

      So the statistically sound way of saying it is that the null hypothesis is that reading rates are the same, and their study has failed to reject the null hypothesis.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      If you want to be precise, overlapping intervals mean that we lack evidence to assert that the means are statistically different for our chosen confidence level

      source
• Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  since His Lordship’s ADHD diagnosis he’s stopped fighting himself and now chiefly audiobooks. His “reading” intake has upped significantly.

  source
• red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I read 23 books so far this year. I’m doing my part.

  source

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Read 100 last year and at 25 now this year. Lower now since no longer have a job that let’s me read.

    source

    • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I managed 55 last year and I don’t know how I managed that.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    What have you read if you don’t mind telling us.

    source

    • Nath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      1. Ralph Lister’s Skyhold series - Really great fun
      2. Devoured all of Honor Harrington by David Weber in about 3 months. It was all I could do not to just start them again I wanted more!
      3. Kevin J Anderson’s Hidden Empire series. A really interesting concept of an antagonist alien species. I liked them.
      4. Julie Kagawa’s Talon books - a fun bit of Urban Fantasy about dragons that shape shift into human form and try to live among us. I’m probably not its target demographic (but I like middle school and teen books more than I’m probably meant to), but I’d read these again.
      5. Currently reading Naomi Novik’s Telemere series and I’m 100% hooked. It’s more dragons, but this time set in the Napolionic wars.

      source
    • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Image

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  We need to bring back playboy!

  source

  • Tooden@aus.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    @MantisToboggon "I only buy it for the articles!"😉 @maniacalmanicmania

    source

    • Nath@aussie.zone ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Ever read a Playboy magazine? Without any exaggeration or sarcasm, those articles were often really good!

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Ascend910@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I stopped going to the library to read physical books because I am too lazy to travel. I do read magazines and reseach papers off libgen tho

  source

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I read way more ebooks than paper books. The convenience, portability, low light control, and text size manipulation are big wins with ebooks over paper. There’s also simply tons of ebooks available from public libraries.

    source

    • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I’m something of an audio book guy, so I can “read” while also doing mindless household chores like folding laundry or loading the dishwasher.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Tooden@aus.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  @maniacalmanicmania I can say that my OH has increased his amount of reading in the past two years.

  source

  • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I am very impressed that a hydroxyl group can read at all, let alone increase their amount of reading!

    source