“Science” has a rather strict “scientific” definition. Predictability, repeatability, etc. I don’t remember details.
Can reading assholes be considered science?
Submitted 6 days ago by Edward@lemmy.4d2.org to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.4d2.org/pictrs/image/a6c4c879-4c5c-4ee5-8ee3-d31403643d14.webp
Comments
Lembot_0004@discuss.online 6 days ago
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
Mighty Shai-hulud!
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 6 days ago
Not any more than palm reading is a science (it’s not.) It could be considered an art I suppose, but science needs to be things that can be tested and produce repeatable results.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Not any more than palm reading is a science
Well… stick with me here, this is just a devil’s advocate hypothetical.
Your hands are your primary method of interacting with the world. The creases, callouses, and other incidental features are reflections of the ways you most frequently use them.
Obviously you can’t divine the future, but you can gather information about a person. I dare say you could devise experiments to detect correlations between certain features of the hands, and features of the person: their profession, hobbies, grooming habits, clumsiness, etc.
I think a sincere scientific study could identify several hand features with moderately predictive correlations.
Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 5 days ago
You’re right in that you could learn about someone based on their hands. It’s the subjective nature of the predictions that make palm reading unscientific. There have been studies to show that certain health issues manifest in our skin. Palm reading isn’t focused solely on those issues though. It tries to predict all kinds of things (wealth, relationships, misfortune, etc.) How would you create a control group for a study like that?
iii@mander.xyz 5 days ago
If me and 5 friends read your a-hole, I bet all of us would come to the same conclusion.
Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 5 days ago
That would be like one research team coming to a single conclusion. Still wouldn’t make it scientific.
58008@lemmy.world 6 days ago
I can tell by the flavour that a new love interest will come into your life imminently.
Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
From the chaote perspective, any dynamic system with chaotic properties can be used for divination. But a science? Nah.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
Can’t you just read X instead?
angrystego@lemmy.world 6 days ago
It can be considered pseudoscience.
HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Some people would. You know, for science.
TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
I’m a reading asshole, am I a science?
Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
Taking advantage of the best daring lip sensitivity to investigate with anomancy the boss, getting ascending to the employee of the month.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 5 days ago
Are haemorrhoids considered a bad omen…?
Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Isn’t that what Sylvester Stallone’s mom did for a living?
Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
Your bumhole tells me you’re a skeptical. So I probably can’t interest you in a great wrinkle- removing miracle-cream? A smoother hole begets a healthier life, a higher libido and more financial stability in life.