Submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world [bot] to technology@lemmy.world
Amazon saved children’s voices recorded by Alexa even after parents asked for it to be deleted. Now it’s paying a $25 million fine.::“For too long, Amazon has treated children’s sensitive data as its own property,” Josh Golin, executive director of Fairplay, said in a statement.
Should have been 25% of profits. Percentage based systems work.
25% of revenue, not profits. If it was profits then the fine would likely be $0 due to creative accounting.
Woah we got all that data for just $25m? Bargain.
Lolololol 25% of profits for keeping on to recordings for too long? You people are insane. You just hate Amazon and want to stick it to them.
The irony is none of these lemmy instances are run by companies with registrations and can do whatever the fuck they want when your data yet everyone is a okay cause pinky promise I hate Reddit too! 🤦♂️
A penalty should be something you want to avoid. A 25 million (occasional) fine for Amazon is like asking me to pay a .25 (occasional) fine for, say, no parking. It has no deterrence.
On the other hand, a percentual on the profits is a lot more deterrent, expecially for a company. Maybe 25% is too much, I agree, but let’s say a 2-5% of the profits is not that bad.
Note that a fine that is a percentual of your profits (or income) is far more balanced because it hurts the small and the big company the same way.
25% of profits for wilfully breaching privacy law… that’s actually quite low given what creative accounting can do for profits.
GDPR maximum fine is 4% of global turnover. Luckily for amazon it’s capped otherwise they’d be on the hook for billions.
$25 million? Jeff Bezos had so much money he could probably just tip that amount to whatever servant he has who polishes his head with an orbital buffer.
Heck depending on how many voice recordings there are, they might be able to make 25 million selling that off for AI training some day…
That’s like fining me $0.10
You’re fined for 0.10$
Meet me a my office!
Can I use the fine as a tax deduction?
Oh no, don’t throw me into the briar patch!
I remember when people were trying to convince me that Alexa wasn’t recording every thing you said. Now here we are.
$25 million? That’s ridiculously cheap.
did jeff bezos downvote your comment?
$25 million dollars. That’s just pocket change for Amazon.
I’m sure if it was a £2.5bn fine, they’d be much more careful about customer privacy going forwards…
Yep, but it never will be a $2.5 billion fine.
Meta had been fined $1.3 billion this year by the European Union’s GDPR. Before that Amazon was fined $781 million.
So 2.5 billion could happen, but not in the US obviously.
Why even fine corporations at this point? Put the ones involved behind bars and shut the company down, liquidate their assets, and divide it to the victims when they do criminal shit.
If the death penalty exists and corps are people, why aren’t companies being executed?
If that actually were the punishment, you’d actually see companies behaving a lot less evil very quickly. A tiny fine that isn’t even a blip in the companies pocket won’t do anything.
Yeah? What’s that; 14 seconds of their profits?
Right. 25 mil per second of recording is more appropriate.
25 million? They made $514 billion in net sales last year. 25mil is a fucking rounding error for them.
Cost of doing business that was already put in this years’ projections. Bezos can pay for this small fine out of his change jar and we’ll continue on, business as usual.
Fines mean legal for a price and it’s only effective if it costs more to pay it than the profit made from it
Like $25 million is laundry change for them. They will probably pay it in quarters.
That fine should have to be 25 billion, not million. Then they’d actually learn a lesson.
and to pay the US government $25 million within the next week
This is dumb. Not only is that pocket change to Amazon, none, absolutely zero dollars of that is going to the parents and kids affected. They’re the ones that asked for it to be deleted. They’re the ones that got recorded. NOT the US government.
The article does say there are private lawsuits pending. I would guess that will include more payouts from amazon and money to the families.
I wonder what they thought the device was going to do
yawn. $0.01 fine for Amazon. Cool
Ah, 25 million per child? Finally a fine big enough to make a tech company feel conseque–
[Touches earpiece] one moment, I’m getting an update–
That’s 0.0001x their 2022 profit or 0.01%. If I did my math correctly, it’s about 58 minutes of profit.
Another reason not to have that shit in your house.
Fines like this should be calculated based on % of corporations net assets. Something like this, say 5-10%. That would at least get their attention.
Same with personal fines honestly, percentage of income or total wealth, depending on the crime.
Definitely should be based on current net worth of assets, else someone who just lives off borrowings against assets pays nothing as they have no income.
It just count loans as income for tax reasons.
You’d have to be a fucking idiot to install one of these devices and not expect this to happen, lol.
If you were actually dumb enough to put one of these listening devices in your home owned by the most powerful & greedy company on the planet you deserve to have your privacy invaded. People are fucking stupid.
i mean my brother bought them and refuses to remove them. There is no convincing him to remove them. They are in basically every room and nobody defends me when I want them gone because of convenience.
I cannot even ask for the data to be erased because it is not on my account.
That fine for them is like a trip to McDonald’s for me in terms of worth.
I think. Math might be off. But like 25 bucks assuming Amazon is worth $1T
Damn look at you, Mr. Fancy Pants, earning buckets of cash!
Fuck these corporate oligarchs.
Wow a whole 25 million? I am sure that will teach them!!! /s
JingJang@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This isn’t a “fine” to Amazon. 25 million dollars is just the cost of business.
Make this 250 or 500 million and then… Maybe… it’s a fine.
BrudderAaron@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fuck it. Hit them with a couple of billion and THEN companies might stop being shitheads to basic human rights.
amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Totally agree. Facebook should have been absolutely crippled financially after influencing an election, but they get off scot free.
My idea is this:
Instead of a maximum fine being applied, you take a violation, lets say influencing an election, and you calculate how much of the corporations revenue came from that source. (i.e. Facebook messenger revenue would not count for election manipulation). Then, take a huge portion of that revenue (60%, 70%? [Depending on the violation]) and take that from their revenue. Who gives a shit if Facebook literally has to close down one of their services from lack of finances, thats what they get.
JingJang@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Agreed.
I only mentioned my range because then perhaps it would move to a different column in their budget.
25 million is nothing to Amazon.
A couple of billion might move it into an enterily new spreadsheet and maybe even precipitate a meeting to figure out who needs to be fired. Maybe.
Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
This isn’t entirely correct, the $25M fine is a slap on the wrist sure, but this is a COPPA ruling, which essentially means it’s a $25M slap on the wrist and a “change the way you’re doing shit now or else”. Nobody has gotten to the “or else” with COPPA afaik, but you’d essentially be risking daily fines until fixed and risk losing operating rights in the US entirely. Would that actually happen to Amazon? We’ll never know, because they’re going to fix it before they get there. Not worth the risk.
JingJang@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fair enough, good reply.
Upvoted :)
(Maybe Lemmy will bring back some good discussions in threads like these…)
I think the public gets fatigued when we hear about the profits these companies make and then we see these comparatively small fines.
If this is how we “steer the vessel of regulation” then I can accept that this is a push in a better direction.
However, I still feel that a fine in the hundreds of millions, ( not bankrupting but a “shot in the leg” versus a “slap on the wrist”), is appropriate for these very large corporations. They already weild so much political and economic power that consequences for things like this should be higher.
In other words, let’s encourage them to operate responsibly in the first place.
Weborl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This. Fines should not be fixed at a specific amount, but rather as a percentage of the total income of the company for a year. Just as laws are regulated according to technological advances, fines must also be regulated to truly impact companies and make them think twice before breaking the law.
northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Business fines should always be dealt in percentages.
Aldrond@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It shouldn’t be a fine at all. It should be jailtime for executives involved, and asset seizure.
gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 year ago
That is the solution.
And before the usual story “but companies are not people and you cannot punish people for things a company did”: in the end, in a company there is always someone that make a decision. It is too easy to commit a crime and then say “but the company did it”.
average650@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It does depend on how many violations there were. If it was 1, then that’s a hefty fine. If it’s a million, then yes… Cost of business.
JingJang@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s not how laws work.
If you break the law, you deal with the consequences.
It’s not a “game system” where additional infractions lead to multipliers of consequences.
Child labor laws exist because we saw what happened in the past when they did not exist. We, as a society, care about our children enough to protect them. That includes preventing them, by law, from working in industrial environments.
Some states seem inclined to repeat the past by repealing or loosening child labor laws… .
Now another child is dead as a result.