AI is the “most aggressive” example of “technologies that are not done ‘for us’ but ‘to us.’”
Well said.
Black Mirror AI
Submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/bc29cbcd-8afa-4d09-99db-4d5f2a0b39a3.jpeg
Comments
passepartout@feddit.org 10 months ago
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Nice … I look forward to the next generation of AI counter counter measures that will make the internet an even more unbearable mess in order to funnel as much money and control to a small set of idiots that think they can become masters of the universe and own every single penny on the planet.
Prox@lemmy.world 10 months ago
We’re racing towards the Blackwall from Cyberpunk 2077…
barsoap@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Already there. The blackwall is AI-powered and Markov chains are most definitely an AI technique.
IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 months ago
All the while as we roast to death because all of this will take more resources than the entire energy output of a medium sized country.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 10 months ago
we’re rolling out renewables at like 100x the rate of ai electricity use, so no need to worry there
Zozano@aussie.zone 10 months ago
I’ve been think about this for a while. Consider how quick LLM’s are.
If the amount of energy spent powering your device (without an LLM), is more than using an LLM, then it’s probably saving energy.
In all honesty, I’ve probably saved over 50 hours or more since I starred using it about 2 months ago.
Coding has become incredibly efficient, and I’m not suffering through search-engine hell any more.
DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Actually if you think about it AI might help climate change become an actual catastrophe.
heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
This might explain why newer AI models are going nuts. Good jorb 👍
pennomi@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It absolutely doesn’t. The only model that has “gone nuts” is Grok, and that’s because of malicious code pushed specifically for the purpose of spreading propaganda.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 10 months ago
what models are going nuts?
heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
Claude version 4, the openAi mini models, not sure what else
Vari@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Not sure if OP can provide sources, but it makes sense kinda? Like AI has been trained on just about every human creation to get it this far, what happens when the only new training data is AI slop?
hedhoncho@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Why are the photos all ugly biological things
TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 10 months ago
They were generated using shitty AI models.
SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Because the new quantum computers are starting to run off of biological systems instead of standard motherboard chip sets. The biological cells react more collectively and with a higher success rate than the current systems. Think of it kind how a computer itself is fast but parts can wear out (water cooled tubes or fan), whereas the biological cell systems will collectively react and if a few cells die, they may just create more. It’s really a crazy complex and efficient breakthrough.
Alaik@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
I know what I’m going to try and research tomorrow.
Also, we inch closer and closer to servitors every day.
BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
That’s… actually quite terrifying.
The sci-fi concern over whether computers could ever be truly “alive” becomes a lot more tangible when literal living biological systems are implemented.
SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The actual reason is that the use of biological photos is a design choice meant to visually bridge connect artificial intelligence and human intelligence. These random biological photos help to convey the idea that AI is inspired by or interacts with human cognition, emotions, or biology. It’s also a marketing tactic: people are more likely to engage with content that includes familiar, human-centered visuals. Though it doesn’t always reflect the technical content, it does help to make abstract or complex topics more relatable to a larger/extended audience.
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
Funny that they’re calling them AI haters when they’re specifically poisoning AI that ignores the do not enter sign. FAFO.
Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Sheesh people, it’s “fuck around and find out”. Probably more appropriate in the leopards eating face context but this works enough.
tatterdemalion@programming.dev 10 months ago
What are you talking about? FAFO obviously stands for “fill asshole full of”. Like FAFO dicks. Or FAFO pennies.
Gismonda@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m glad you’re here to tell us these things!
Clanket@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Fair As Fuck Ok?
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
First Albatross, First Out
Naich@lemmings.world 10 months ago
Fluffy Animal’s Fecal Orifice.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Nice one
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 months ago
The Arstechnica article in the OP is about 2 months newer than Cloudflare’s tool
Goretantath@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Yeah, this is WAY bettee than the shitty thing people are using instead that wastes peoples batteries.