Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

something's got to give

⁨548⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Bort@sh.itjust.works⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/b07543de-865c-4e8b-9c49-95be4e5de3a5.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    2

    source
    • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Nothing wrong with me

      source
      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        3

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Szewek@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bro, animals among the most numerous creatures? Bacteria, Archaea, and viruses are surely more numerous. I bet the same applies to fungi and plants. Oh, and protists, since they are unicellular and have twice the total biomass of animals.

    In terms of biomass, animals are barely significant. And they are relatively big. So they surely are less numerous than other groups.

    www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1711842115

    source
    • 2deck@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Count em

      source
      • bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Catch em

        source
    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Something wrong with you

      source
    • Gerudo@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Technically, they did say AMONG the most numerous.

      source
      • Szewek@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I mean, yes, inaccuracy is another issue here. But I assume “the most numerous” means better than average, or at lest not the worst in its category (unless you actually standardize for the time since divergence, then there are probably some niche microbial taxa, some rare extremophiles, that are actually less numerous; still, surely worse than average).

        source
    • jaybone@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Who invited this guy?

      source
    • samus12345@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I don’t think anything that not an animal can be accurately called a creature.

      source
      • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Then you would be wrong.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    at 1, I’m sitting and thinking of all the beautiful things i could’ve become.

    source
    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You don’t understand, I coulda had chill. I could have been a capybara. I coulda been somebody… instead of a human, which is what I am, let’s face it.

      source
      • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        instead of a lyrical oracle and a most appreciative one?

        source
  • M137@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Anyone know what kind of animal that is? I need to see more! (and is it albino?)

    source
  • noxypaws@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I am so glad the image went the same place my mind went

    now go enjoy this brilliant parody, “I Can Only Count to Four”: www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8ccGjar4Es

    source