Szewek

@Szewek@lemm.ee

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Liquid Trees⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  I guess it would take a lot of time to accommodate Mars for trees. More than for algae ;)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨我喜欢你让我兴奋的样子⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  显然，DeepL 也有简体中文。它为我自动选择了简体中文。这样看起来更好吗？

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨So true⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t get it, why you have a line of crisps next to the sandwich? And why would you have cold food with cola?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The pipeline⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  WTF are boneless wings?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨something's got to give⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean, yes, inaccuracy is another issue here. But I assume “the most numerous” means better than average, or at lest not the worst in its category (unless you actually standardize for the time since divergence, then there are probably some niche microbial taxa, some rare extremophiles, that are actually less numerous; still, surely worse than average).

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Is lemm.ee hosted in the US? (FediDB info)⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I didn’t know about Cloudflare, thank you!

• Is lemm.ee hosted in the US? (FediDB info)fedidb.org ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨meta@lemm.ee⁩ | ⁨5⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨something's got to give⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Bro, animals among the most numerous creatures? Bacteria, Archaea, and viruses are surely more numerous. I bet the same applies to fungi and plants. Oh, and protists, since they are unicellular and have twice the total biomass of animals.

  In terms of biomass, animals are barely significant. And they are relatively big. So they surely are less numerous than other groups.

  www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1711842115

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨🌟 Red Dot Design Award Winners: 5 Innovative Products That Stole the Spotlight⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Lol Tesla Cybertruck XDDD