Szewek
@Szewek@lemm.ee
- Comment on 50 shades of green 5 days ago:
And in a generally quite good journal…
Well, science hippies and their humour ¯_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on 50 shades of green 5 days ago:
Links or it didn’t go through the peer review
- Comment on Liquid Trees 4 weeks ago:
I guess it would take a lot of time to accommodate Mars for trees. More than for algae ;)
- Comment on 我喜欢你让我兴奋的样子 4 weeks ago:
显然，DeepL 也有简体中文。它为我自动选择了简体中文。这样看起来更好吗？
- Comment on So true 4 weeks ago:
I don’t get it, why you have a line of crisps next to the sandwich? And why would you have cold food with cola?
- Comment on The pipeline 5 weeks ago:
WTF are boneless wings?
- Comment on something's got to give 5 weeks ago:
I mean, yes, inaccuracy is another issue here. But I assume “the most numerous” means better than average, or at lest not the worst in its category (unless you actually standardize for the time since divergence, then there are probably some niche microbial taxa, some rare extremophiles, that are actually less numerous; still, surely worse than average).
- Comment on Is lemm.ee hosted in the US? (FediDB info) 5 weeks ago:
Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I didn’t know about Cloudflare, thank you!
- Submitted 5 weeks ago to meta@lemm.ee | 5 comments
- Comment on something's got to give 5 weeks ago:
Bro, animals among the most numerous creatures? Bacteria, Archaea, and viruses are surely more numerous. I bet the same applies to fungi and plants. Oh, and protists, since they are unicellular and have twice the total biomass of animals.
In terms of biomass, animals are barely significant. And they are relatively big. So they surely are less numerous than other groups.
- Comment on 🌟 Red Dot Design Award Winners: 5 Innovative Products That Stole the Spotlight 1 month ago:
Lol Tesla Cybertruck XDDD