Szewek
@Szewek@lemm.ee
- Comment on 50 shades of green 3 weeks ago:
And in a generally quite good journal…
Well, science hippies and their humour ¯_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on 50 shades of green 3 weeks ago:
Links or it didn’t go through the peer review
- Comment on Liquid Trees 1 month ago:
I guess it would take a lot of time to accommodate Mars for trees. More than for algae ;)
- Comment on 我喜欢你让我兴奋的样子 1 month ago:
显然，DeepL 也有简体中文。它为我自动选择了简体中文。这样看起来更好吗？
- Comment on So true 1 month ago:
I don’t get it, why you have a line of crisps next to the sandwich? And why would you have cold food with cola?
- Comment on The pipeline 1 month ago:
WTF are boneless wings?
- Comment on something's got to give 1 month ago:
I mean, yes, inaccuracy is another issue here. But I assume “the most numerous” means better than average, or at lest not the worst in its category (unless you actually standardize for the time since divergence, then there are probably some niche microbial taxa, some rare extremophiles, that are actually less numerous; still, surely worse than average).
- Comment on Is lemm.ee hosted in the US? (FediDB info) 1 month ago:
Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I didn’t know about Cloudflare, thank you!
- Submitted 1 month ago to meta@lemm.ee | 5 comments
- Comment on something's got to give 1 month ago:
Bro, animals among the most numerous creatures? Bacteria, Archaea, and viruses are surely more numerous. I bet the same applies to fungi and plants. Oh, and protists, since they are unicellular and have twice the total biomass of animals.
In terms of biomass, animals are barely significant. And they are relatively big. So they surely are less numerous than other groups.
- Comment on 🌟 Red Dot Design Award Winners: 5 Innovative Products That Stole the Spotlight 2 months ago:
Lol Tesla Cybertruck XDDD