Submitted 6 days ago by cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
I have copilot at work and honestly it’s not worth the price.
The number of times it has created grossly inaccurate meeting notes or summary items basically means I can’t trust it to be shared with someone who wasn’t there, so it’s mostly just there as a roll the dice memory jogger for participants.
The components embedded in office apps like PowerPoint are absolutely useless, and that’s where I really wanted it to help.
I’ve found it to have extremely limited value, but not zero. It’s been useful as a shortcut for things I can already do myself. For instance, I can easily get syntax for a param block, or build a window form. Could I do it myself? Absolutely, and pretty easily. And I can recognize when it’s right vs wrong. But it’s marginally faster to have copilot do it instead of digging up the documentation.
It’s more like a party trick than a trillion dollar revolution. The $20/month for a full time dev is probably around the break even point for the labor savings. It’s not going to save THAT much time.
Agreed, it’s not completely devoid of value, but it’s definitely not saving me any super meaningful time.
There’s some labor efficiency but I would be really surprised if it even got to an hour a week in productivity gains.
I’d be more forgiving, but what MS Copilot sucks at the worst is working with Office files: PowerPoint: completely useless Excel: useful for some tasks if I reformat all my sheets into tables, so mostly useless Word: can’t even answer why the formatting of the file from my coworker is a mess (which is every coworker), let alone try to fix it. But it will gladly take a succinct piece of information and make it into an insufferable 50 pages of fluff. It summarizes documents well and helps with reviews. OneNote: creating content it’s ok, but useless at retrieving info. Outlook: It tries to help, mostly confirms that my language is may be perceived as cold and offensive. Which is good, because that was my intention.
It is surprisingly helpful with PDFs and extracting data and cleaning up formatting.
Unsurprising, it does great with CSV and other open data formats. Maybe there is a lesson here?
I think the lesson here is that proprietary binary formats are way more difficult for a LLM to parse.
If only we could use plaintext for everything…
They’ve been using OOXML for their file formats since 2007.
I’ve used co-pilot too: Not impressed.
Early co-pilot (before chatgpt) was pretty decent. You typed in a comment what you wanted to do and you could cycle through code examples easily. While it wasn’t 100% accurate, it was close enough to get you what you needed and took care of the annoying work.
As soon as ChatGPT got integrated, shit went downhill fast and I uninstalled it. It was a night and day difference.
You’re thinking github copilot while the article is about Microsoft copilot, which is a completely different product. Of course, confusion is completely understandable and their naming is almost as bed as their operating system.
Copilot is one of two LLMs I’ve briefly tried. It was noticeably better than Gemini was at the time, but still seemed entirely redundant. Nothing it (and Gemini) offered to do were things I wanted help with. I like research and writing, so why would I outsource those things and burn down an acre of rainforest in the process?
Gemini is fucking abysmal, Google should be embarrassed.
Colour me surprised
I’ve heard that copilot is specifically useless. Mostly gets in the way.
No fucking way.
It says in multiple places, “do not believe the answers you get from this thing. Seriously, it’s more like a magic 8 ball than anything useful. You get what you get. Don’t come bitching to us.”
I got a better one…put a rat in a can, place two papers with two different answers… As a question and let the rat go. Each paper is coated in delicious cheese.
Just figure out if you trust a rat…do you go for the answer an idiot picked? Or do you go for the answer that was less tasty?
Often the trick behind a lot of these ridiculous methods is they make you hope for a specific outcome, thus exposing a previously hidden desire
I like Copilot. [Blajah does not support downvotes.]
blajah
It seems that some people don’t get the joke. At least, I assume it’s a joke.
Yes, thank you hahaha. What’s the downvote count up to? I can’t see them due to my instance.
You’re not IN blahaj sonny 😎
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 days ago
I had low expectations for AI, and it is even less useful than I expected.
Omgboom@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
My work procured me a copilot license and it really is disappointing. It’s wrong or overly vague most of the time, and just generally doesn’t answer questions in a useful way. Copilot in the IDE is marginally more useful but it rarely gives you an efficient answer and obviously it’s never anything novel, it’s just copy and pasting from stackoverflow answers (or questions even.)
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 days ago
I miss functioning web searches.
AI is filled with as much, if not more, SEO designed slop as web searches do now but it is presented as if the user clicked “I feel lucky”.