The main reason Kamala’s crowd aren’t AI : Trump said it’s AI generated
You can set your watch by his obvious lies.
The many, many signs that Kamala Harris’ rally crowds aren’t AI creations
Submitted 4 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
xavier666@lemm.ee 4 months ago
idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 months ago
When he says her crowds are AI, it means he’s using AI on his crowds.
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
It’s crazy that so many people get so hung up on the size of the crowds. Like are you going to vote based on who gets the bigger crowd? What happened to voting based on the candidate’s policies and track record as a politician?
billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 months ago
In 2020, when Trump lost, one of the common lies spewed by the right to claim he really won was comparing the sizes of his rallies to Biden’s.
Of course, that was during COVID restrictions, when the Dems were staying home and socially distancing, and the GOP pretended like the global pandemic wasn’t real.
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Many people are just Size Queens. They can’t enjoy democracy unless they see a large crowd size.
roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The argument started because Trump is a narcissist who is obsessed with crowd sizes. The Harris campaign has been teasing him that their crowds in the same places have been larger because they know it will make him unstable. Unstable Trump can’t take the hit to his ego so goes on social media and starts lying about the Harris crowds being fake. Reporters rake the bait and write articles disproving his claims.
admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 months ago
The sad state of political campaigning in 2024.
Tetsuo@jlai.lu 4 months ago
Trump chooses a topic, lies constantly about it and let people get tired fact checking. Would crowd size be on the news without Trump activating that subject?
kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
Trump only cares about winning , which includes pointless dick measuring contests.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 months ago
As mentioned elsewhere, “so many people” are caught in the wake of trump’s unrelenting torrent of lies and accusations.
‘Journalists’ use them as a reliable source of clickbait when they have nothing to report.
Americans remember his first press conference as ‘predisent’.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 months ago
Generally in elections, the mere idea that one party is favored over the other can convince people to vote for them. So yes, “fake it til you make it” is a legitimate campaign strategy.
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
What a disgrace.
GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 months ago
And the more we discuss it here, the more it legitimizes Trump’s AI argument. He’s laughing all the way to the ballot box.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The argument for manipulation is “hurrr durrr you can’t see the crowd reflected in the engine!”
Here’s a zoom:
So let me explain…
You see this shadow across the crowd?
Everyone in that shadow is standing under an overhang.
See this shadow reflected in the engine?
THAT’S THE OVERHANG AND THE SHADOW.
You can’t see the crowd because it’s all blended in to one big dark line.
RedShaniNqkomota@ani.social 4 months ago
Do you really think someone actually read the absolutely nonsense post your ai writes for you?
Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 months ago
Best argument is, if you believe it’s ai, come and see fit for yourself!
Michal@programming.dev 4 months ago
And make the crowd bigger. Good plan 👌
style99@lemm.ee 4 months ago
When that convicted rapist gets defeated in the election, you can rest assured that he’ll resort to the same clumsy accusations of conspiracy and AI-generated this and that to try and deflect from the fact he’ll be the one trying to steal the election AGAIN.
Maybe it’s about damn time that convicted rapist was actually punished and not responded to as if anything he said or did was worthy of discussion.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 months ago
Good, let Trump and his followers believe no one supports who or turns out to her events.
They can be so safe in knowing that she is unliked that they can stay home on election day.
admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 months ago
Before welcoming this as good news, be aware that democrats might also start thinking this misinformation is real, and decide to stay home and “not vote for a losing team”.
Petter1@lemm.ee 4 months ago
What sense does it make to not vote for the loosing team? It is not like you bet with your ballot 😂