Yeah that wasn’t humanity’s brightest moment.
Comment on Dumb glasses
ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Remember when people got punched for wearing Google glasses?
Peppridge farm remembers
lumen@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Stopped this bullshit for a decade or so
FishFace@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Stop advocating violence against people who might be recording video in public, just because the device doing it is on their face.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You actually should advocate for violence against people who are violating your rights
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
A clear violation of the social contract deserves a swift response. Those glasses come off your face, and onto the pavement.
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
It’s easy to see someone holding up a camera or cell phone making it obvious they are recording. If you don’t want to be recorded, you can just stay the fuck away from them. You can’t avoid cameras/recording devices you can’t see. Fuck meta, and fuck anyone else wearing their garbage, privacy invading glasses.
Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
If you wear the video glasses, expect to be fucking punched or worse. Jackass.
WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Nah. Violence against them is okay.
lumen@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
But violence isn’t the answer. And certainly not to people doing legal stuff in public. Wearing a Google Glass in private is different though.
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
All I’m saying is last time this tech trend came around, enough people who had a problem with it took drastic actions that directly affected the popularity of wearing a spycam on your face.
Wouldn’t surprise or upset me if history repeated itself.
InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
doing legal stuff in public
Just because its legal doesn’t mean its right
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 3 weeks ago
violence is the answer against people who already commit violence. reducing your sense of privacy and safety is violence. not to mention that this data could be used for ICE’s benefit, which would even add physical violence.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
When the law abandons the people, the law of the jungle returns.
WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Violence is SO often the answer.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Yeah, putting cameras in glasses is a really stupid idea
lumen@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
People hitting other people because they don’t like whatever legal activities the other person is undertaking, that’s stupid.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You would have fought for the confederacy because it was legal to own slaves
Quexotic@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
“Never believe that
anti-Semitespeople like this person are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. Theanti-Semitespeople like this person have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”Jean-Paul Sartre
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
pretty close to the brightest in the past decade, tho
FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Now we can punch everyone wearing Ray Bans
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I was kinda down with that already.