lumen
@lumen@feddit.nl
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Not install, but hold. Yes, I do have that right where I live.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
I’m not trolling. You just made it illegal to film on beaches!
I’m just illustrating that you can’t draw a line here.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
No that’s not what happened. You realised justifying physical violence with your personal feelings and beliefs isn’t right.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
And what if a whale washes up on the shore? Can the local news agency film that?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
The smartest thing you did today was delete that comment. What happened, did you have an epiphany?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
It’s illogical because you’re being recorded for far more nefarious purposes anyways.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Have fun beating up journalists! I’m glad you aren’t a politician.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
What?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
To draw a line between what is and isn’t reasonable is impossible.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
That’s unenforceable.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
And you’re the second person in this thread who can think. Thank you.
I’ve been threatened with violence twice already in this very thread, in the hypothetical scenario that I would film them. I don’t think Lemmy is for me. Too violent.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
You’re projecting. I only want to spy on men.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Thank you. Yeah I got pulled in to this thread a bit too much. It’s just bugging me that multiple people have already said to me that they’d commit physical violence if I would do something legal they’d feel uncomfortable with. Multiple people threatening violence over a simple hypothetical disagreement. It’d be better for me to stop arguing, probably. But it’s hard to let go.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
You can’t force people to act on you’re subjective feeling of being uncomfortable. Can’t.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
No smart glasses. Alright, then I would wear hidden camera’s in the buttons of my shirt. The point I’m trying to make here, is that this is not a technological debate. It’s about freedoms: having your freedoms means having to respect others’ as well.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
That’s a twisted view on the definition of violence… Anyhow, how would you distinguish between people filming for journalistic purposes, people filming and sending it to Meta, and people filming for other reasons? How would you decide who deserves your violence?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
I agree it can be creepy. But where I live, and in the US, as well as many other countries, you have no expectation of privacy in public. That’s why it’s called public. It might feel right to want to impose some restrictions on public photography, but since there’s absolutely no way to fairly draw a line, it’s better to not impose limits at all.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
No? I just don’t think filming in a public place is wrong. Why would it be? No one has been able to provide a reason.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Nice opinion
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
I don’t appreciate the threat of violence. I won’t surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
It’s not strange to want a line drawn somewhere regarding public photography. But I just don’t see how that line ever can be drawn in a fair way.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
But how do you draw the line between good and bad use cases? Even trying to draw that line brings you on a fast lane to totalitarianism.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
No they don’t. I might actually go film on the sidewalk just outside your home, and there would be nothing at all you can do about it.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
What right would be violated here exactly?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Yeah? What will you do exactly?
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Moral rights don’t exist.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
No you won’t. I’m might set up a camera on the sidewalk outside your house tomorrow, and there’s nothing you could do about it. Nothing. You’re not in charge.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
Finally someone who can think. Thank you. None of these people’s arguments so far have been rational.
- Comment on Dumb glasses 2 days ago:
People hitting other people because they don’t like whatever legal activities the other person is undertaking, that’s stupid.