Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?
Comment on Dumb glasses
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 2 months agoviolence is the answer against people who already commit violence. reducing your sense of privacy and safety is violence. not to mention that this data could be used for ICE’s benefit, which would even add physical violence.
lumen@feddit.nl 2 months ago
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 2 months ago
sharing that information with facebook is the violence
lumen@feddit.nl 2 months ago
That’s a twisted view on the definition of violence… Anyhow, how would you distinguish between people filming for journalistic purposes, people filming and sending it to Meta, and people filming for other reasons? How would you decide who deserves your violence?
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 2 months ago
if i feel uncomfortable being filmed i will make myself heard, first nonviolently, then maybe with a bit of physical pressure. if I don’t even get to know when i am being filmed that’s intensely devious.
StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I agreed with you up to this statement, no Karen, getting filmed in public is not violence, even if it’s concealed, Jesus Christ
desra@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Consent scales, the one thing we all owe each other is basic human decency and a right to live our lives unimpeded as long as you’re not harming anyone. Filming/eavesdropping/invading boundaries and making people uncomfortable in a space let alone their own skin is grossly invasive
StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
It absolutely is! But you know what it’s not? Violence. As soon as you start being hyperbolic you lose nearly all credibility because now I think “right this person is being dramatic”
desra@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
How can someone be dramatic about consent?