orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 week ago
The worst part is that this problem has already been solved by using LIDAR. Vegas had fully self-driving cars that I saw perform flawlessly, because they were manufactured by a company that doesn’t skimp on tech and rip people off.
I wouldn’t really called it a solved problem when waymo with lidar is crashing into physical objects
www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/…/ar-AA1EMVTF
NHTSA stated that the crashes “involved collisions with clearly visible objects that a competent driver would be expected to avoid.” The agency is continuing its investigation.
It’d probably be better to say that Lidar is the path to solving these problems. But not solved.
call*
Lidar doesn’t completely solve the issue lol. Lidar can’t see line markings, speed signs, pedestrian crossings, etc. Cars equipped with lidar crash into things too.
I oversold it in my original comment, but it still performs better than using regular cameras like Tesla did. It performs better in weather and other scenarios than standard cameras. Elon is dumb though and doesn’t think LiDAR is needed for self-driving.
Let me guess……you watched mark rober’s video? Lol
I’ve watched a few random ones over the years. No idea who he is.
Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Are those the ones that you can completely immobilize with a traffic cone?
Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You say that like it’s a bad thing lol if it kept going, that cone would fly off and hit somebody.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 week ago
A human also (hopefully anyway) wouldn’t drive if you put a cone over their head.
Like yeah, if you purposely block the car’s vision, it should refuse to drive.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
The same is true when you put a cone in front of a human driver’s vision. I don’t understand why “haha I blocked the vision of a driver and they stopped driving” is a gotcha.
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yes lol