I’m amazed that ads are so effective that they can make more cramming unwanted video in my face than just asking me for a couple bucks.
Comment on Netflix will show generative AI ads midway through streams in 2026
lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
I’m all for services making a reasonable profit and being able to fund new shows and such endeavors…
But we’re rapidly getting into an environment of “soaking viewers for all we can get out of them” simply to feed the fucking shareholders ever larger payouts.
🤷♂️ 🤦♀️ 🖕
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Aux@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
No one wants to pay money for the services they’re using. Ads is the way to go.
SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 3 hours ago
Nobody wants to pay for all the little individual piecemeal services and shit, because it’s wildly expensive and inconvenient, and because they keep adding ads to the paid stuff anyway because greed, so what benefit is there to paying?
ferrule@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
you just need to keep a shit list of brands that are now dead to you.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I have a dwindling list of brands that are not yet dead to me.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
A good rule of thumb is that if you have heard of a brand but don’t remember anything positive about them they should probably be dead to you.
gradual@lemmings.world 18 hours ago
All of them.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
exactly, if you want to be an ethical consumer you’d need to be a hermit.
in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 hours ago
What’s wrong with being a hermit?
gradual@lemmings.world 16 hours ago
Hermit here, can confirm.
adarza@lemmy.ca 18 hours ago
they already make significantly more profits off of each ad-tier sub than they do the ad-free… yet it still isn’t enough. greedy fucking bastards.
Don_alForno@feddit.org 14 hours ago
How is showing me ads for things I will make a point not to buy because I implicitly hate the products of people showing me ads more profitable than the twenty fucking bucks a month I already give them?
Imagine if all that misallocated marketing budget got used to develop better products instead.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
And imagine if products that couldn’t get by on their own merits without ads wouldn’t exist at all. How much more productive and happy our society would be if we got rid of useless products and the negative feelings ads induce when we don’t have those useless products at the same time.
Aux@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
Just imagine that your personal anecdote is not representative of human behaviour. The biggest lie and a myth is “I will pay more not to see ads”. No, you won’t.
Libra@lemmy.ml 20 hours ago
There’s a word for that: enshittification
flandish@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
the word is actually “capitalism.” it’s baked into its dna.
Libra@lemmy.ml 17 hours ago
Capitalism - and I am the last person to defend it - didn’t used to be like this, or at least not as bad. shrug I could probably tolerate capitalism if, say, no company was allowed to employ more than say 15 people.
flandish@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
yeah it’s not like Smith predicted this but yeah … it’s certainly not human nature either.
i’d be happy if shareholders, all of them, were held criminally responsible for the criminal things corporations do - all the way down to wage theft and child labor.
wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org 11 hours ago
Capitalism didn’t used to be like this because it was still developing, but it was always going to become this. Enshitification is not a bug, it’s a feature. Capitalism is supposed to work like this. And when it wasn’t, it was just because it wasn’t there yet, mainly due to technical limitations.
slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
It’s an interesting debate, if what we are seeing now is the natural, inevitable progress of capitalism, or it could have gone a better way, but eg. Reagan fucked it up for all of us in the 70s.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 6 hours ago
Late stage capitalism, then. 🤷♂️
Strider@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
That it wasn’t always like this doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t always lead there though.
I think that is the point.
anzo@programming.dev 9 hours ago
Continued expansion or ever-increasing profits is a definitive characteristic of the system though. Enshittification is just the latest feature it found, for software-based companies.
One could also argue that enshittification is independent to software, like diluting juice or other “innovations” that products received…
taladar@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
Sounds a lot like gig economy for everyone.