Comment on Will Republicans try another Federal Right to Work attempt?

abbadon420@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• LethalSmack@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Right to work is: A right to be fired at any point for any reason or no reason at all

  The goal is to get around any union protections that require things like a legitimate reason to be fired from a job.

  It also has the added bonus of drastically reducing the benefits of unions and making them much easier to prevent.

  source

  • Dagrothus@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I love how we name laws that really mean the exact opposite of what their name implies. Very american.

    source

    • eezeebee@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Land of the free

      source

      • DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Image

        source
  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Being fired for any or no reason is at will employment.

    Right to work has nothing to do with that. It’s about allowing people to not pay union dues. Those people are still protected by the union contract.

    source

    • LethalSmack@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You’re right. I updated the comment

      source
  • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You’re conflating “at will employment” with “right to work” laws.

    source

    • LethalSmack@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You’re right. I updated the comment

      source
  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The way I try to remember it is that it comes from the employers perspective:

    • Right to Work employees to death by ignoring unions
    • The employer has the right to fire workers At Will

    source
• CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Hopefully, I’m not wrong, but basically unions typically require Members Pay dues out of income. Right to work essentially forbid that practice making do payments optional. Which drives down the union revenue

  source
• WolfLink@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Unions typically have an agreement where employees don’t have to join the union but they still have to pay a fee equivalent to union dues, and the employer can’t pay non-members more than union members, or other similar restrictions.

  The idea is to remove the ability for the employer to offer an advantage to non-members.

  TLDR it’s an essential part of making a functional union.

  source
• modality@lemmy.myserv.one ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Right to Work means you can have a union job but not join the union. You have the right to”right to work” without being a union member or paying any union dues. Generally it means you get all the benefits without contributing but also unions are usually a lot weaker since so many people opt out, so also the benefits are lesser. Because it is governed by state-level laws, details vary from state to state.

  source
• HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Is it in Colorado? If it is, it’s a good thing. If not, it’s a bad thing. Right to work is a bad thing.

  source
• Bronzebeard@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  They prevent you from having to join a union to work at a company. And you don’t have to pay dues either.

  You can effectively benefit from the unions bargaining without supporting the union - which if enough people do that kills the union (the goal of the law).

  source