teslasaur
@teslasaur@lemmy.world
- Comment on Public service announcement 1 day ago:
- Comment on Everyday AI looks more like the '08 housing bubble 1 week ago:
Pension is the correct English term. 401k doesn’t mean anything unless you’re american.
- Comment on Everyday AI looks more like the '08 housing bubble 1 week ago:
Your pension is tied to these companies stocks. I can pretty much guarantee that “your” pension fund owns quite a few of these stocks.
But, and this is the important part, that isn’t your pension. It is the pension for those that are retired right now. There is no saved stack of money that you earned during your life thats waiting for you. Unless there is an equal amount of tax paying workers by the time you retire, you wont be getting that pension.
- Comment on At 1% 1 week ago:
Thats cute. There are so, so many machines that have vga still in my field.
Basically every hmi panel in existence use vga still. And password-less vnc.
- Comment on Disney sells us imaginary heroes while supporting real world villains. 4 weeks ago:
I like how people are actively making up terms to silence those with legitimate questions. Hector is actively questioning and debating. But the kneejerk reaction is to call them sealion and remove their posts. Fucking brilliant.
- Comment on Disney sells us imaginary heroes while supporting real world villains. 4 weeks ago:
I agree that she is basically a distraction from the real issue. How come there are lawmakers that gives the slightest shit about her opinion? There is the issue.
- Comment on Or the common cold! 4 weeks ago:
Not just that. I actually lied when i said that “your” pension is in stocks. It is in fact the current pension for that are retired right now. Unless there are as many younger people working and paying taxes to fund your retirement by the time you’re old enough, you’re not gonna have one.
- Comment on Or the common cold! 4 weeks ago:
You are a stock holder. Your entire pension is mainly in stocks, i can guarantee it.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
Faster than anyone can follow? I followed it. Everyone in this thread followed it. It only seemed to be you out of the loop. That’s fine, but you didn’t have to expose your ignorance so publicly. You’ll pick up the lingo eventually.
I find it hilarious that being correct is being ignorant. It’s ok that you’re wrong, it’s your right.
But you do care though, you obviously care.
Of course i do, but since it’s not clear from language that I do due to the reasons that I laid out, I understand that you’re confused. See how language is confusing when words change meaning?
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
You know the old adage “you wouldn’t follow your friend of a cliff if he jumped”.
I think i’d rather use the terms correctly, rather than follow the erronious zeitgeist.
Just because technology has created micro universes where word change meaning faster than anyone can follow, doesn’t mean they are right.
Or to put it more sarcastically so you have something to think about. I literally don’t care, literally.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
Thats all well and good. But you’re wrong. Nazi is a type of fascist. Zionist is a different type of fascist.
So by mixing them up you are simplifying in a manner that is reductive and wrong. It would be akin to using maoist and anarchist interchangeably because they are economically “left”.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
Perhaps if you studied the history and origins of nazism you’d think differently. When you call people nazis, that really aren’t nazis, then you just rob it of meaning.
The fact that sarcastic irony has twisted the meaning of a word faster during this age than should have been possible, only enforced my belief that the meaning of words are important. Otherwise you end up in a conversation with someone and you end up spending all of the time explaining ‘your’ definition of what a word means.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
Like i said. Some Zionists are fascists, but can’t be nazis. By definition. When you start to throw words around that doesn’t mean what you think they mean, they will eventually stop having any meaning at all.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
No, but you might be a bit smarter about adding fuel to a fire.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Ok, just ignore the fact that this kind of shit exasperbate the problem.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
It’s funny you say that. The right is gonna see this sarcastic nonsense and take as literal liberal agenda. Just so you know what you’re feeding.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
Zionists are fascist, but they aren’t nazis. Hope we cleared that up for you.
- Comment on The McDonald's employee who called on Luigi has never received their "reward", folks chasing the 100k for Kirk may not either... 5 weeks ago:
So baseless thought. It would be interesting to consider the moral implications of taking money to uphold the law as it is.
I seriously doubt OP had a joke in mind, i think they didn’t check if anyone actually got a reward and really thought no one did.
- Comment on The McDonald's employee who called on Luigi has never received their "reward", folks chasing the 100k for Kirk may not either... 5 weeks ago:
How do we know they didn’t get the reward for the tip on Luigi?
I genuinly don’t know, it doesn’t look to be a source here.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
Nazism is a form of fascism, identifying ethnic Germans as part of what the Nazis regarded as a Nordic Aryan master race.
Lots of ethnic Germanic folks in Israel, to be sure.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
Except the word nazi denotes and is defined by the hate of Jews.
You might say that sionists and nazis are similar, but they are categorically different. Or it would be slightly self-destructive as a Jewish state to want to exterminate all Jews, dont you think?
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
So he’s a sionist then. Not a nazi. Stop throwing words around if you don’t know what they mean.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
So when does he start exterminating the Jews?
- Comment on 2hot2handle 1 month ago:
He is, because spontaneous is, in fact, the correct term here.
Aha. I didn’t know that
- Comment on 2hot2handle 1 month ago:
Not my question. But ok.
- Comment on 2hot2handle 1 month ago:
But is he wrong?
- Comment on 2hot2handle 1 month ago:
But is he wrong?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I mean that there are people who (none named, none forgotten), have a tendency to get lost in fiction and forget about reality. I mean that there is more to gain by deriving happiness from something real.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
Whilst i think happiness derived from fiction is real, I would refrain from letting it be my only source of happiness.
I could think of a million things in the world that i would like to do if I hade the resources to do them. None of them are fictional. But i can experience a glimpse of them through fiction.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I’ve seen plenty of abusive mothers on tv. But they aren’t physical in their abuse.
But have a look at “Precious” if you want to be triggered.
