While text based messages on usenet may be dieing, the file sharing is still quite popular. My radar and sonar still pick up plenty of signals.
The rise and fall of Usenet: How the original social media platform came to be
Submitted 1 year ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Brokkr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
nobleshift@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Are there any tools that would make it easy to use with Sonarr or Radarr?
spiderman@ani.social 1 year ago
I don’t think irc and usenet is dead. It’s still used a lot for piracy.
WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 1 year ago
I think it comes to down to the definition of "dead". Both are certainly dead for the reasons they were created.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 year ago
Either you die a hero…
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
They’re dead as social media; all anyone uses them for is piracy these days and not to, you know… Talk to people.
doubletwist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I still use irc every day for legitimate work/technical support purposes.
spudwart@spudwart.com 1 year ago
Well the issue with Usenet is the following:
- Usenet is quite old
- Usenet is not very well known.
- Usenet has many barriers to entry.
- Usenet groups have garnered an exclusionary reputation.
- Other easier options have existed for a long time for basic social media interaction.
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Usenet also largely became a venue for bootlegging and porn – and due to the nature of the protocol, companies hosting Usenet services didn’t want to have to store all of that shit. After about 1995, you didn’t go there for discussion anymore. Eternal September messed it up. Lemmy is fortunate that you can’t really use it for file sharing, a few images notwithstanding, or the same thing would happen.
dgriffith@aussie.zone 1 year ago
and due to the nature of the protocol, companies hosting Usenet services didn’t want to have to store all of that shit.
You can opt not to carry certain newsgroups, eg skipping alt.binaries.* would reduce your storage requirements drastically.
The fact of the matter is that people wanted something more “instant and accessible” than newsgroups that were synced overnight, and modern social media sprang from that desire.
SeedyOne@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It should be emphasized, the above list is accurate for Social Interaction as the discussions and text have indeed waned. It does mention that at the end, but still.
For media sharing specifically, many of those above items are either trivial OR are actually what helps it thrive. Somehow, 30 years later, we’re still under the radar and maxing out connection speeds without having to VPN, seed, share or dodge ISP rules and DMCA requests.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Nntp is easy to set up and run.
There’s a webUI and a forum front-end for nntp.
Nntp is as well-known as MC files (if you need to. You know).
An internal slack is as exclusive.
Email<->nntp gateways exist. What’s easier than email ?
MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m old, but does anyone remember alt.pave.the.earth? And the spinoff alt.chrome.the.moon?
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 year ago
I found my first girlfriend over Usenet. de.rec.sf.starwars. You can probably still find my messages in archives.
knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
usenet and irc were ‘the fediverse’ before it became trendy.
InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So much this! I am old, I guess, but I was on Usenet for years before the web was even invented. When I became aware of the fediverse, I got serious Usenet vibes. A decentralized model, several servers, you access one and get what it sends you, but it syncs with all other servers. You‘re getting everything in the entire Usenet and what you post gets everywhere too… we’ve come full circle, I think, even if we now use ActivePub instead of NNTP… a shame people nowadays know of it as “that piracy thing” instead of what it once was (and was designed to be).
knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Preach! My first experience with Usenet was rexx scripts on a mainframe using tn3270. Same with all of the ftp sites. Remember fingering id software?
WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 1 year ago
Back in the day I'd use UUCP over dial up to the local university to get email and my chosen usenet groups. Ah, the nostalgia of coming home to find my Amiga's floppy had run out of room...
hansl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
All of the protocols that have been ratified are federated. That was kind of the big thing of the internet. HTTP, SMTP (email), FTP, etc. All federated.
When people talk about defederating threads, I’m always curious why they think Net Neutrality is a bad idea, or if they’d appreciate if their email providers didn’t allow emails to Gmail because they don’t like big corporations…
Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 year ago
email servers and domains are blocked constantly and have been since the 90’s when they are pushing spam, malware,etc.
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
IRC wasn’t federated though, but you could indeed connect to multiple servers with the same client.
Vqhm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean
There were networks such as: EFnet Undernet Quakenet DALnet
different servers in different regions did network together.
There was a different word for ‘defederation’ back then: net split en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsplit
And it was usually from a networking issue.
I’m still salty that an IRCOP from a (now defunct) Canadian server used a net split as an attack: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC_takeover
to steal a # channel from my friends and make it private long enough to sort out the bot auto bans. We appealed, but because they were an IRCOP, the other IRCOPs from the federated servers were just like, “whatever, pound sand users, go run a server if you want to control stuff like us.”
Anyway, IRC was a connection of various servers run by various people/corporations/universities etc.