It’s pretty gross. Made even grosser in the context of the Voice, where one of the things the No campaign has been doing is attempting to label the Yes campaign as the real racists. What utter bollocks.
Some Australians seem more outraged by accusations of racism than by racism itself
Submitted 1 year ago by Nonameuser678@aussie.zone to australia@aussie.zone
Comments
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Shit has become so unhinged. This is my first referendum so I’m sure how it compares. But the rhetoric just feels so vicious. The no campaign say the voice is divisive but it’s their campaign that’s divisive. They’re importing some of vilest culture war tactics from the US.
WendyMsGator@aus.social 1 year ago
Gay marriage referendum didn't get as vicious as this and that's saying a lot.
spiffmeister@aussie.zone 1 year ago
The conservatives have been getting worse over the past say, 10 years, Trump kind of accelerated things and that style of “who cares what the truth is” was exported from the US.
The right wing in general was always going to end up being like this though.
vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Straight out of the US conservative playbook. An embarrassing look in Australia, and shows in the most obvious way that they are not acting in good faith.
LineNoise@kbin.social 1 year ago
Similarly, expect the networks and avenues of communication being built to be rolled into other areas as well. Trans rights, same sex marriage etc. will all be targets anew. Wouldn’t entirely be surprised if we started to see a push back against gun laws either.
We’ve had hints of this in the past but this is by far the most direct coupling between the US reactionary right and Australia’s.
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 year ago
Murdoch created the “American” playbook :)
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 year ago
The good news is that society has accepted that racism is a bad thing.
The bad news is that the main consequence of this is that it’s unacceptable to accuse anyone of racism if they have any social capital. It’s also unacceptable to shout racial slurs and such, but if someone is sufficiently rich, talented or well-connected, even that can be explained away as consistent with them not being racist.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Nath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Turn on the YouTube subtitles for extra hilarity. 30 years later and technology can’t understand a raw Australian accent.
Commiejones@hexbear.net 1 year ago
We have all been raised in racist societies. We all have little racist worms in our brains. We owe it to ourselves to fight our internal racism as well as helping each other recognise when we are being bigots.
Arguing what you said isn’t racist is itself racist 99% of the time. If you think maybe what you said really wasn’t racist ask why it is racist don’t try to defend racism.
If someone starts giving excuses or justifications for why what they said wasn’t racist just say “The only correct response when someone tells you something you said was Racist is ‘Oh I’m sorry. I didn’t realize. I will try to watch out for that in the future. Thank you for helping me fight racism’”
If they keep arguing you just say “I guess you don’t wan’t to fight racism. You know what that makes you?”
HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl 1 year ago
It’s the same back in the fatherland, Blighty.
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 year ago
It would be appreciated if you didn’t refer to the UK as the “fatherland” in the context of Australia. It might be seen as a bit backwards and disregarding of the long history of this land, before British settlement
HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl 1 year ago
I used it intentionally mockingly just to be clear.
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Marcia Langton, one of the key architects of the voice to parliament proposal, found herself at the centre of a fracas midweek when comments she’d made last Sunday during a public forum at Edith Cowan University appeared on the Australian newspaper’s website shortly before question time on Tuesday.
The Coalition had resolved to use the final parliamentary sitting week before the referendum to go full demolition on the voice, and the deputy Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, opened the batting in question time.
This whole stink bomb turned on whether or not Langton harboured views about the prevalence of racism in her own country, and whether her observations about this phenomenon amounted to a provable thought crime.
Examples of institutionalised racism include but are not limited to: the lie that there was no one here when the British arrived; the documented atrocities of frontier massacres; the policies of forced removal of Aboriginal children from their families – practices that have contributed to a prevalence of intergenerational trauma, a studied phenomenon in survivors of the stolen generations.
As the Olympian and former Labor senator Nova Peris argued this week, a constitutionally recognised advisory body will allow the lived experiences of First Nations people to be seen.
Langton was perfectly within her rights to posit that some Australians who are resolved to vote no on 14 October will do so because they harbour racist views, or are being influenced by a toxic sludge of negative messaging.
The original article contains 1,476 words, the summary contains 243 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Taleya@aussie.zone 1 year ago
This happens quite often - pointing out someone may have inadvertently spoken from a position of blindness gets you more outrage from the ego blow than the actual offense itself. You can pretty much triple that shit for anyone right leaning.