Work any non-union corporate job. You can’t pick your boss, you have to do what you’re told as soon as possible, and you are under constant surveillance. You’re also expected to publicly act enthusiastic over stupid management policy announcements. Deviate from any of this and you’re punished by losing your livelihood.
Without getting into current politics can someone describe to me what an authoritarian regime looks like?
Submitted 19 hours ago by Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
Comments
Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 hours ago
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 hours ago
Umberto Eco, in 1995, laid out 14 common charactistics that characterize what he describes as ur-fascism, fascist societies independent of the time and place.
- Cult of Tradition – A syncretic belief in ancient truths, rejecting modern interpretations.
- Rejection of Modernism – Viewing the Enlightenment and rationalism as the root of moral decline.
- Cult of Action for Action’s Sake – Valuing action over reflection, leading to anti-intellectualism.
- Disagreement is Treason – Suppressing dissent and critical thinking as threats to unity.
- Fear of Difference – Exploiting xenophobia and racism to unify the in-group against outsiders.
- Appeal to a Frustrated Middle Class – Mobilizing those feeling economically or socially displaced.
- Obsession with a Plot – Promoting conspiracy theories to justify aggression against perceived enemies.
- Enemies are Both Too Strong and Too Weak – Portraying adversaries as simultaneously formidable and feeble.
- Pacifism is Trafficking with the Enemy – Viewing life as perpetual warfare, dismissing peace efforts as betrayal.
- Contempt for the Weak – Glorifying strength and dismissing compassion as weakness.
- Everybody is Educated to Become a Hero – Promoting a cult of death and martyrdom.
- Machismo – Elevating aggressive masculinity and denigrating non-conforming sexual behaviors.
- Selective Populism – Claiming to represent the unified will of the people, dismissing individual rights.
- Newspeak – Employing an impoverished vocabulary to limit critical thought.
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 13 hours ago
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
A single person, or small group, control everything.
Dissention is not allowed. Those people are removed via various methods from threats, to the jailing, and potentially all the way up to accidentally falling out a window or off a balcony.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 19 hours ago
You don’t get to vote or if you do it doesn’t matter. There is little to no separation between the three pillars executive, legislative, and judicature. So there is little to no oversight, which leads to a breakdown of the rule of law. People can and will be disappeared. People live in fear and try to adapt, self-censor. Authoritarian leaders need a bogie man, somebody they can blame for all their failures. So an ethnic group, minority, or another country will constantly be blamed for everything from the economy to ingrown toe nails. The elite will get richer, everybody else pretty much won’t.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 18 hours ago
People live in fear and try to adapt, self-censor. Authoritarian leaders need a bogie man, somebody they can blame for all their failures. So an ethnic group, minority, or another country will constantly be blamed for everything from the economy to ingrown toe nails. The elite will get richer, everybody else pretty much won't.
Not necessarily. Authoritarians are usually corrupt/incompetent, which tends to lead to these things, but competent dictators with legitimate public support exist, China being the best-known example.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 15 hours ago
China? The country of Tiananmen Square? The country whose people practically develop an ever-changing coded language to avoid big brother coming down hard on any sort of criticism? The country that runs “reeducation” camps for many who do get caught? The country that has Uyghurs and Tibetans to blame “within,” and Japan without? Or the US? Where senior cadres of the party magically grow richer?
Don’t pin authoritarianism on lack of administrative competence.
Rhoeri@piefed.world 14 hours ago
Go to .ml and disagree with someone.
Voila!
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Just imagine a cult of personality. One person who demands/secures blind allegiance such that they are effectively the sole remaining authority on any given topic infected by the cancer, ranging from education to health care to myriad other policy decisions.
frankenswine@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
every society that does not grant you your basic human rights is considered authoritarian. these include: freedom of speech, freedom of press, fair trials, elections, right to education, etc.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 18 hours ago
*Basic political rights. You can have a perfectly liberal democracy where the average person is one missed paycheck away from starving to death. Education for example has nothing to do with authoritarianism, except that authoritarians tend to benefit from lack of education.
WereHacker@lemmy.ml 16 hours ago
A list often used on this topic is from a famous academic and writer you may know: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 18 hours ago
Think of the list of political rights you take for granted. The right to voting, free speech, association, peaceful assembly, etc. Those don't exist or are severely curtailed, meaning that political activity and discourse that anger the ruling class can and will be punished. How much is tolerated and what kind of punishments are doled out varies depending on the strength and heavy handedness of the ruling regime.
GhostPain@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
It’s a meaningless term with a non-definition definition. Like that old definition of porn… “I can’t tell you what it is but I know it when I see it”.
Usually used as a way to paint the enemy as “bad”. Except it’s almost always a pot/kettle situation.
Every regime of any kind has laws and rules that are flouted by the ruling classes.
Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 hours ago
Oh. So authoritarianism isnt real?
GhostPain@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
I mean it’s real within the context of being used as a term to somehow castigate your enemies for the exact same things you do. And by “you” I mean all governments.
Notice it’s usually the West calling Socialist or Muslim states “authoritarian”?
Same with them throwing around “dictator” when that leader was democratically elected.
I’m not gonna debate this because obviously I’ve struck a nerve with some people, and I find the topic boring, but just wanted to let you know that propaganda reaches deep and some folks are uncomfortable with knowing they licked the boot, even unknowingly.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
Zero news media criticizing the leader(s)
Obsession with playing the National Anthem constantly in schools.
Obsession with Pledges¹ or Flag Raising Ceremonies²
Mandated Politically related Attires³
Government involvement in family planning⁴
Non-violent⁵ critique of leader(s) results in near certain police warning/harassments or detained/arrested
¹USA “Pledge of Allegiance”
²PRC, Flag-Raising Ceremony was done very frequently, I remember it being like either weekly or monthly
³PRC, the “Little Red Scarfs” that symbolizes “Communism”, I didn’t know what that meant at the time
⁴PRC: One Child Policy, forced abortions against the mother’s will, forced sterilizations; On the other side of the coin, in USA: Abortion bans and forced to continue an unwanted pregnancy
⁵PRC: “Xi should resign”; USA: anything Charlie Kirk related, Bald JD Vance memes, anything deemed “anti-ICE”