[deleted]

Comments

• humanamerican@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  NEATO - Now Excluding America Treaty Organization

  source

  • lauha@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Canada is still part of nato

    source

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Do you think US’ians don’t think the US is “America”?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• N0t_5ure@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  NATO has already been destroyed. If Russia attacked a NATO country which then invoked article 5, do you think that the U.S. would come to their aid?

  source

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    How much TrumpCoin did the host country buy in advance?

    source
  • yakko@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I mean yeah. Russia attacked a country that merely glanced at NATO with eyes that yearn, and we’re still sending Ukraine money and weapons.

    Whatever the case may be, Trump’s main tactic is to spread despair; do not oblige him.

    source

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Russia attacked Ukraine multiple times. There is a reason that the Russo-Ukrainian war is generally considered to have started in February 2014 (with arguments it goes back even farther).

      Even in 2022, the US and NATO mostly were taking the stance of “This sucks and we’ll try to help but good luck”. We only came to support Ukraine after it was clear they could hold off the initial assaults and bleed russia dry.

      At best, expect similar. if russia attacks a different country (and… considering all the incursions, cyber attacks, and outright assassinations over the decades…). “This is horrible but we must sue for peace and were you REALLY using all that extra land Finland? Come on, take one for the team”. Except that the logistics of getting our arms dealer on becomes a LOT messier if we are actually obligated, by treaty, to put boots on the ground rather than just sell guns and say “We’re not with them”.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • arrow74@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Yes, US military contractors have wet dreams about how much money they would make off it. Trump would follow the buisness interest.

    source
• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Forming an agreement to protect Poland at all costs and calling it the Warsaw Pact.

  What? No? Is that one taken?

  source
• mrdown@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Should have happened decades ago

  source

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    A NATO without the US’s fetish for a truly massive standing army (and desire for forever wars on foreign soil…) is just a target to be invaded.

    And unless the EU is willing to dedicate very large amounts of money towards having their own standing armies (and the political/logistics mess that will entail) then it doesn’t matter.

    source

    • mrdown@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nato only served the USA interests and imperialism. Nobody else

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• AnyOldName3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  The vast majority of NATO that isn’t the US is covered by the EU’s Mutual Defence Clause, so this kind of already exists. It sucks for the NATO members that aren’t in the EU, though, e.g. Greenland.

  source

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    They’re no longer Danish?

    source

    • nilaus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      They are part of the kingdom, not the nation state. Greenland left tve eu in 1985.

      source
• HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Whatever fits with NOCHEETO gets my vote

  source
• themurphy@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  We could also look for more alliancens who are against the US, calling it “the allied”. The US could find a name with a N and a Z and fill in the rest.

  source

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    … Naoz?

    source

    • Guttural@jlai.lu ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nazi. I think they were going for Nazi Nazi.

      source
• snooggums@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I think you a word.

  source
• crandlecan@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Neat 👍

  source