latest app build showing invalid on my android
Loops publishes their recommender algorithm
Submitted 1 day ago by FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world to fediverse@lemmy.world
https://pixelfed.social/p/loops/906908755174645758
Comments
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 50 minutes ago
i guess loops is browser based now
atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well. This is good news.
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Isn’t loops open source?
4Robato@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
So then this is just a shorter explanation, and not “publishing” the algorithm? Because before already anyone could read the code and understand how it works, it would have just taken longer.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
This infographic reeks of AI slop.
korendian@lemmy.zip 3 hours ago
“Everything I don’t like is AI”
newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 4 hours ago
What about it?
PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 3 hours ago
probably because the block under the cpu looking thing doesn’t indicate how it interacts with the cpu looking block and the block that ranking engine feeds into the ranked “for you” feed also there’s two user controls
fubarx@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
This is outstanding!
Not being based on “rengagement” or “monetization” means it’s purely interest-based, with a touch of serendipity.
One of BSKY’s distinctive features was to have “pluggable” algorithms. Fediverse would do well to support it so people who are not into te weeds could choose how their feed is curated.
Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Can you personalize your own ranking algo that can be shared with friends? That’s the breakthrough we’re all waiting for…
FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Not that I know of, but you could make a feature request if one doesn’t already exist github.com/joinLoops
oeuf@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
That would be extremely groovy. Even just having a few flavours of algorithm that you can choose from would be really cool.
RedStrider@lemmy.world 1 day ago
that’s kinda how bluesky works with the feeds and all
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
I can’t even zoom into the picture on mumble on this website
cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
meldrik@lemmy.wtf 1 day ago
Hoping for something like this for PeerTube and personal customisation of the algorithm.
PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 20 hours ago
Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I’m gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it’s something more simplistic.
Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain
newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 4 hours ago
What’s too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.
PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 3 hours ago
oh lord your looking for a fight. i tell you this i kinda already won since your looking my input to criticize, but ill say this the personalized focus block alone. that’s an exact “thing” and if you want more well your gonna have to ask more specific questions and your gonna demand that i help you.
also I helped loops in the past. I can tell you that the GitHub code isn’t the code that’s used
FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Loops kind of sucks.
harmbugler@piefed.social 5 hours ago
Compared to…?
OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No u
FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean, tell me I’m wrong. Tell me that there is good content. Tell me it functions well.
korendian@lemmy.zip 23 hours ago
It’s kind of in beta.
alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Loops… Algorithm???
harmbugler@piefed.social 17 hours ago
… yes?
alekwithak@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
That is surprising for those who have a long familiarity with Loops. The chronological timeline was a major selling point.
ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Cooool
Ascend910@lemmy.ml 18 minutes ago
You knew w what? I am actually into this where the algorithm used sre published