PixelPilgrim
@PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
- Comment on How We Lost Communication to Entertainment 20 minutes ago:
Yeah I’m starting to think dansup projects aren’t real fediverse projects since everyone seems to have issues with with them.
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 8 hours ago:
mastodon.social/@pixelfed/104618452882003745
Lol I had to do custom range search to find that link, originally it was an interview dansup did talking about loops was 5 years old and an pixelfed project. I guess now it’s it’s own thing
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 8 hours ago:
I have no idea what turned miserable mean. I’ve been leaving him alone as best I can, I keep encountering him unintentionally.
If you’re a backer (of any person or project) you should ask questions and expect answers. For me personally I’m forward with my project, that way someone can take it over or build on top of it
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 12 hours ago:
Actually loops is 5 years old, but it seemed to have a big overhaul in the past few months as in it actually going through development and the source code is actually being published.
Apparently the activitypub protocol was announced to be implemented in October of 2025. Which is kinda funny.
Also I did hop to different instances looking for users on across instances and yeah I could only find 1 out of half dozen I tried. So I’m sceptical on activitypub protocol integration. It could be that they aren’t federated
I’m actually impressed that there is 8 instances because I didn’t except there to be more than one this year
I help dansup with loops back in February and January. I put some pressure on him for answers and well he folded and basically blocked me, so I got the impression that he didn’t have the temperament to develop loops, but I’m half wrong because well he did eventually make it open source.
Also dansup is getting paid, he asked for grants and ran a fundraiser specifically for loops, so it’s not exactly “in their free time”
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 19 hours ago:
Of course my slow instance glitches when I looked up Florida. Ugg.
Florida was more on my mind to use as a concrete example. I do have a county and city level c/ that I created months ago that I can do start doing something with.
But i could do a c/cdda and just gather post from reddit
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 19 hours ago:
Okay I figured out what old Reddit is and it’s rss features. Yeah I can see how that would be a way to reduce load of getting content
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 19 hours ago:
I’m say loops is fedi-washed like a reactionary. There’s no other instances, apparently it dies use the activityhub protocol.
I will comment that the major corporate sites like reddit and YouTube make hard for fediverse platforms to take off because they’re hard to complete with. When they started out they didn’t have competition people would get bored and come to them, then they would build niche communities on their own.
There hasn’t been a blunder for most of 2025. Id count the tik Tok ban generally being the last one to capitalize on (but I believe that loops project just didn’t bother to act).
I’ll have to research that last paragraph
- Comment on [deleted] 19 hours ago:
So is she enjoying it? Like gotta be ready weird to have your d sucked by someone openly hating you
- Comment on Throwing ideas out for lemmy 20 hours ago:
What’s your problem? 😂
- Comment on Does Lemmy need a fork or a rewrite due to its maintainers views? 20 hours ago:
I have the mindset of taking any idea that works for yourself and use it for your purposes. Like we should be stealing ideas from big tech and foss-ing them. Id assume big tech is worse than this maintainer
But what would the fork look like? Finding the maintainer contribution and rewriting them?
- Submitted 20 hours ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 21 comments
- Comment on Having withdrawals from political conflict 3 days ago:
Yeah I’m kinda being put on this path. I forgot to note that I feel like the group I’m helping isn’t doing enough things in general, but it’s also the holidays
- Submitted 3 days ago to rant@lemmy.sdf.org | 2 comments
- Submitted 5 days ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 4 comments
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
You already tried that
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Nope
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Sorry it’s on you to prove it not me
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Well you take your L and move on
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Well the code is published on github for you to review. I’m sure you can find the functions and variables the digest them in your head to match them to the blocks in the picture
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
I’ll explain it if you admit my points are right and your too ignorant on this subject to argue with me
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Nope asking you to prove that the algorithm works like it does in the picture.
I don’t helping you understand super basic things
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
It actually is on account that it’s real world experience that gives me insight into how algorithms are done. Experience
I’m not worried about credibility since I look more credible than you because you flipped a question and never answered how you know
So buddy you gonna prove the algorithm in loop works exactly like it does in the picture or give me the W?
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Nice so you got my perspective then?
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
I already explained how I know. So you can answer my question or just dodge?
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
How do you know it’s implemented as described in the picture?
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Lol you really don’t understand recommendation algorithms 🫵🤣
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
I didn’t fail, I actually succeeded. Plus judging by how hard it was to do a simple algorithm an algorithm like this would take way too much effort.
Given from the infographic they didn’t even think about an algorithm let alone worked on it
- Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm 1 week ago:
Yeap, turns out you can post junk code on GitHub and say it runs whatever. I never seen anyone independently verify that the GitHub code runs similar to loops or compiles the code for the app
- Comment on Everyone is so close to grasping your unique vision! 1 week ago:
That’s brag worthy. I should help fnb. I do know one guy in the DSA that helps them out their mutual aid efforts
- Comment on Everyone is so close to grasping your unique vision! 1 week ago:
That’s why I simply just say “I’m doing something what are you doing?”
Then they’re gonna really fold. There won’t be any infighting.
Most likely they’ll flip the question but just make sure you did something