Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Are they still underpants if you aren't wearing pants?

⁨122⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz⁩ to ⁨showerthoughts@lemmy.world⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Are pants underpants if you don’t wear something under them?

    source
    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      How long does your pubic hair have to be to qualify as underpants?

      source
      • GhostPain@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Depends on how fat your ass is. But anywhere from 3 to 6 feet.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • GhostPain@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s called free balling and no.

      source
  • Apeman42@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The brits neatly sidestep this quandry by calling them pants and trousers respectively, and I think they’ve honestly got the superior system there. I mean one of our American gods (Superman) wears them on the outside, how can we continue in good conscience to call them “under”-pants?

    source
  • Bhaelfur@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    How much pants could underpants pants if underpants could pants pants?

    source
    • GhostPain@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Six.

      Seven if it’s a woodchuck in underpants.

      source
  • t0fr@lemmy.ca ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Are they still underpants if you’re wearing them over pants?

    source
    • billwashere@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Superman enters the chat.

      source
    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well they are not overpants

      source
      • GhostPain@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Akshually, those are tights, not pants. And those “underpants” are short pants.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You’re right, they’re just over legs at that point.

    source
  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    yes

    source
  • mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Should my dog see a vet if it underpants?

    source
    • GhostPain@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Not if it’s nose is still wet.

      But they shouldn’t drive to the vet, just in case.

      source
  • witty_username@feddit.nl ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The yanks had it wrong; underpants never existed. Just pants and trousers

    source
  • url@feddit.fr ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    They are panties

    source
  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is it still an underpass if you’re not passing anything?
    Is it still an overpass if you ain’t over shit?

    source
  • Doomsider@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Inpantception 2: Under the Underpants

    source
  • spittingimage@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I suggest establishing a formal hierarchy of *-pants, with individual terms to distinguish shape, purpose and colour in conjunction with effective and/or absolute layer. And you should be the one to do it, because I don’t have time for that.

    source
    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Layer-0 pants are the ones touching your arse.
      Layer-1 pants cover Layer-0 (tights, stockings, trousers). Layer-2 pants (optional) cover Layer-1 (shorts over tights, trousers, etc…)

      Simple

      source
      • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Layer-3 pants (optional, temporary) - Protective legwear. (Snow pants, motorcycle/horseback chaps, shin guards)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • konalt@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      4th dimensional pants (Hyperpants)

      source
    • watson387@sopuli.xyz ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      With diagrams explaining, in detail, the purpose and function of each layer. By Monday, or you’re fired.

      source