Amen

Comments

• MissJinx@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  dude i posted this and the evangelical sister of my sil replied AMEM. Wtf. do they even read the bible?

  source

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I originally read your comment as “AHEM” due to the typo

    source
• Zuriz@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Blessed are the double blinded, for they will see Truth.

  source
• perishthethought@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Ramen.

  source

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I was just touched by thy noodley appendage!!

    source
• BallShapedMan@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I need this as a T-shirt!

  source

  • ickplant@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If you search Etsy for “evidence-based practice shirt”, you’ll see some options.

    source

    • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Thank you!

      source
• Randomgal@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Imagine being such a fanatic that you behave like the fanatics you criticize.

  source

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You don’t seem to understand the concept of “mockery”

    source

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s a lot of effort for “mockery”. People generally don’t spend time making art for things they don’t care about.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• hoss@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Peer review in principle: 👍 Peer review in practice: 🎲🎲

  source

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    At least in medicine, evidence-based practice means more than peer review. It involves systematic review of a hierarchy of evidence.

    source
• KiwiTB@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Science based.

  source
• Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Empiricism doesn’t work without reason, btw.

  source

  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    • citation required

    source

    • Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Ironically, not a requirement.

      If you’re purely empirical/empiricist, you need at least one person to walk into a pole to prove it’s there.

      If you’re a rationalist, you could rationalise where the poles are.

      If you use both, you’re likely to hit yourself less than when utilising only one or the other.

      source

      • -> View More Comments