Isotropic rule
It seems awfully coincidental that, of all the curvatures out there, the universe should just end up having none.
Submitted 6 months ago by Zuriz@sh.itjust.works to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c4d5f655-95c0-4c7b-9d63-9c362003081b.jpeg
Isotropic rule
It seems awfully coincidental that, of all the curvatures out there, the universe should just end up having none.
You go up enough spacial dimensions and everything looks flat.
you’re telling me that parallel lines don’t intersect, and angles in a triangle add up to 180°?
3D-flat as opposed to 2D-flat, or a bigger, crazier theory?
It’s just not carbonated.
Haha, and insert chest joke
The Universe is locally flat.
And so is the Earth if you localize it enough.
When you localise it enough, earth is actually uphill.
You know someone once told me that time was a flat circle
Wibbly wobbly timey wimey
I aint the sharpest tool in the shed
I think time is more of a torus.
I thought time was a cube?
Universe or galaxy?
The universe is flat.
Most galaxies are semi-flat rotating discs of stars.
Only solid-ish objects like planets, stars, moons, and black holes are spheres.
The galaxy is a sphere!
Not ours. The milky way is a flat spiral. That’s why it’s a line in the sky (obviously the stars we see also belong to the milky way galaxy)
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
It’s flat, sure, except for all the wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey stuff.