This is why I'm always walking fast while smoking. Helth
Study finds that fast walking can reduce lung cancer risk by 50%: A simple health indicator for cancer prevention
Submitted 3 weeks ago by Pro@mander.xyz to science@mander.xyz
http://www.hku.hk/press/news_detail_28592.html
Comments
Klear@quokk.au 3 weeks ago
Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Pro tip, put meth in your cigarettes and you won’t even need to think about walking fast, you’ll be too busy thinking of copper piping.
zout@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
Is it because people who walk faster tend to have less risk for developing lung cancer, or the other way around? Correlation does not mean causation, and from the article I find that walking speed is a marker for the risk of lung cancer, not "you should walk faster to prevent lung cancer".
goat@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
sj_zero 3 weeks ago
Once again procrastinating proves the top strategy.
Nothing but up, my friends!
shalafi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I could see a mechanism for this. Wife and I just had COVID, and I seem to have scored the long-form version. My lungs are so fucked up that walking to the bathroom and back gets my heart racing.
She scored a banging deal and a metal shed we need, went to take it apart yesterday. Pretty hard work disassembling the thing for an hour and a half in the heat.
Today my lungs are better than they’re been in weeks and I suspect that came from pumping air in and out.
redparadise@lemmygrad.ml 3 weeks ago
Gee who could have possibly known that people who feel tired all the time are more likely to get sick!
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
As always, correlation =|= causation. Walking speed is almost certainly linked to like 15 other good health indicators. Exercise is good for you, and you should do it. But these results do not support the recommendation that fast walking will reduce your chances of lung cancer. These results say that if you already walk fast that you probably have a lower chance of lung cancer. Maybe it is the healthier lungs that allow you to walk faster? Maybe it’s a genetic component that makes you walk faster AND reduces your chances of lung cancer. Maybe they fucked up the sample and all of their slow walkers lived downwind of an asbestos plant.
Again, exercise is good for you. Exercise as much as you can. Cannot stress that enough. The health value of exercise is unquestionable and universal, and a lack of exercise is bad for you in every way. Bad science is bad for everyone, though.
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
i have to wonder if just breathing more protects against lung cancer somehow
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Perhaps. Or maybe, people with healthier, more efficient lungs are able to walk faster without breathing heavier. In that case, breathing less might reduce the inhaled carcinogens, reducing the risk of lung cancer.
If you check the actual research, the conclusions are carefully worded to avoid this sort of reporting.
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Probably. Or maybe, people who have healthier lungs don’t need to breathe as much to efficiently exchange oxygen for CO2. So maybe breathing less protects against lung cancer by inhaling fewer carcinogens.
There are simply too many confounding variables to control for all of them. Research like this is important, and it’s not the researchers’ fault. Notice how the conclusions are carefully worded to specifically avoid exactly this sort of news article.