Link without the paywall
Wow you mean the state serves capital? I thought for sure it would once again fight for the rights of struggling artists. \s \s \s
Submitted 2 days ago by IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.ft.com/content/6f28e62a-d97d-49a6-ac3b-6b14d532876d
Link without the paywall
Wow you mean the state serves capital? I thought for sure it would once again fight for the rights of struggling artists. \s \s \s
I’m torrenting movies in order to develop my own AI, your honor. I rest my case. 😎
Someone didn’t read the article
I actually did. The judge made up some BS “your arguments were bad” ruling. Activist judges. This is selective enforcement so that the plebs cannot legally pirate while corporate has free reign.
The judge explicitly did not allow piracy here. Only legally acquired media can be used for training.
I’d feel better about this if meta actually produced anything of value and I was able to also violate their copyright, but they’re just fucking leeches bro
The tinternet is getting like the Wild West again, circa early 200s and Napster and all that… This will pass, dunno when or how but it will pass, or perhaps we will start getting everything paywalled so LLMs can’t just scrape data without some sort of payment. I don’t actually know many people that like AI nowadays
It’s sort of like that… Except instead of a bunch of regular people sharing music, it’s a bunch of capitalists stealing all art for profit. Ofc the major difference is that’s it’s legal for capital.
That’s probably your social bubble. My company is currently deepthroating everything that has AI in its name. I jokingly mentioned they should rename the company to Jira&AI, the joke was not well received.
Anyway, most people I know (including me) are somewhere in the middle - not quite fans in the traditional sense, but definitely not disliking AI.
It is, but as many are artists in some ways it is that they dislike the most
mienshao@lemm.ee 2 days ago
American law has become a literal fucking joke (IAAL). I could’ve guessed the could get the outcome of this case without any facts: the huge corporation wins over authors. American law is no longer capable of holding major corporations to account, so we need a new legal system—one that’s actually functional.
drmoose@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Thats the actual argument and the judge is right here. LLMs are transformative in every sense of the word. The technology is even called “transformers”.
Leesi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Fallacious argument.
Something that can’t generate wine glass full to the brim without a band-aid fix is far from “transformative.” Even if it were:
More like obfuscated plagiarism.
actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yeah, well, I could call my dick the Magnum Opus but that wouldn’t make it two feet long.
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Do you want a new constitution in the United States?
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
If a pact between enslavers is a complete failure, why not just make another one? \s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion
DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Could start with a guillotine for corporations and see how that goes.