I think people in the replies acting fake surprised are missing the point.
it is important news, because many people see LLMs as black boxes of superintelligence (almost as if that’s what they’re being marketed as!)
you and i know that’s bullshit, but the students asking chatgpt to solve their math homework instead of using wolfram alpha doesn’t.
so yes, it is important to demonstrate that this “artificial intelligence” is so much not an intelligence that it’s getting beaten by 1979 software on 1977 hardware
AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 4 days ago
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Its because of all the people saying that LLMs can reason and think and the human brain works just like an LLM and… some other ridiculous claim.
This shows some limitations on LLMs.
baronvonj@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Human brains lose to computerized chess all the time, though. So I guess this is a win for AI tech bros?
REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 days ago
But humans not trained (made) for chess would make stupid mistakes too
A7thStone@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Why are so many people mad when it’s pointed out that the shitty chatbots are just shitty chatbots.
dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I knew there would be these kinds of comments making this obvious point. This is just a demo of how these language models are not going to achieve the “General” part of AGI. It’s going to take a new paradigm
EvilBit@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Now apply this to like, everything else ever.
Machine designed to convincingly fake human internet conversation sucks at ____________!
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 days ago
ChatGPT can’t make a rug as well as a 300 year old loom.
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Too many people forget that specialized, purpose-driven software is often if more effective and efficient. LLMs and other AI are nice when you don’t have a properly defined spec or a flexible algorithm but you pay, literally, for the convenience.
NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
40 year old machine designed to play chess*