Could it be a good candidate for federation? There’s already a few naming standards that would allow a bit of a common ground. And maybe eliminate a few of the big points of failure.
CVE fallout: The splintering of the standard vulnerability tracking system has begun
Submitted 11 months ago by Tea@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2025/04/18/splintering_cve_bug_tracking/
Comments
zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 11 months ago
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 11 months ago
Distributed hosting isn’t really a problem here, its distributed funding for the staff.
thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Im sure DOGE will replace it with a more efficient way for the government to track all of the bugs its computers might be vulnerable to…
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 months ago
…and then send them directly to Putin’s cyberwarfare unit.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Lmao come on. Some people in the EU speak English and knew that naming your standard “European Union Venereal Disease” was a bad idea.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 11 months ago
everything the US gov helps funds now has a question mark over whether it’ll still be here in 4 years…
w3dd1e@lemm.ee 11 months ago
I’m don’t trust any .gov sites anymore. If I’m researching and I see that it’s a government site, I move on. I can’t trust that info.
The whole thing is scary
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
You can kinda trust them if you use an archived version of it from before.
hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Four years? Boy, you are optimistic
Almacca@aussie.zone 11 months ago
This shit seems to change by the minute.
catloaf@lemm.ee 11 months ago
It won’t be here next year, but it won’t be here in four years too.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 11 months ago
tbf to the US they fund an absolute ton of things, eg. I didn’t realise they helped fund lets encrypt and now the CVE database either, I assume it’ll be a drip feed of things being cancelled slowly over time as they find them all
0xD@infosec.pub 11 months ago
OMG I’ve been motherfucking looking for this piece of shit EUVD for the past weeks and only found references and info pages, but never the actual fucking database!! Finally I know it exists.
Why is it hidden? Why does it have that braindead URL? And why, for the love of god, does it have a separate numbering scheme?!
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Because they want the ability to reference other vulnerability sources - like JVN - and not just CVE.
And because, you know, standards.
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I can only assume the stories about CVE have pushed it to the top but I just search “European vulnerability database” and first link went to the database.