I dumped Google photos for self hosted immich and it’s been great. Not sure if it has the ability to connect to photo frames but if you already self host anything else it’s not too much work to setup.
Google Photos will no longer sync with third-party digital photo frames
Submitted 10 months ago by doopinglouie@feddit.org to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theverge.com/news/623306/google-photos-digital-photo-frame-auto-sync-going-away
Comments
jodanlime@midwest.social 10 months ago
Xanza@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I dumped Google photos for self hosted immich and it’s been great.
I went to install immich but it was very heavy… I don’t need AI in a selfhosted Google Photo’s replacement.
Anivia@feddit.org 10 months ago
I’m sorry, but then you are the minority. AI image categorization and face recognition is amazing for finding specific pictures quickly
LKC@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Those features can be disabled to ease up on resources.
ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
I got it running on a raspberry pi and have disabled the machine learning parts in the docker compose file. Works great.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
It’s really not that heavy. I have Immich - and several other services - running on a 4-core VM with 16GB RAM, running on 7th gen Intel hardware alongside another VM and a few LXC containers. It does the job just fine with more than enough overhead.
apostrofail@lemmy.world 10 months ago
a self-hosted* Google Photos* replacement
Knossos@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This is the way.
Check out Immich Kiosk as an example for image frames.
fxdave@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
The only problem is, my internet’s upload speed is slow as hell.
VonReposti@feddit.dk 10 months ago
Self hosted doesn’t necessarily mean hosted at home. Some of my stuff is for example hosted in a French datacenter for redundancy. At one point it was my only server space since hosting at home wasn’t feasible at that time.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
I’m still salty about them discontinuing synchronization between Google photos and Google drive years ago. Such an unnecessary and irritating move. Before that it was getting rid of the picassa desktop app which was actually quite a good photo library manager. The enshitification marches on.
AtariDump@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I was still using Picasso desktop up until about a year ago. I only stopped because the software doesn’t support HEIC.
a_cuddly_fox@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Damn. I miss Picasa. It was a powerful tool too.
const_void@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Stop using Google products. Uninstall Chrome, delete Gmail, etc.
Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Sounds like another reason to keep dumping google crap
scotmartin@feddit.org 10 months ago
This API changes takes away the reason I pay for Google One storage so I can cancel it. If I understand the article correctly I can move to iPhone to keep a similar feature, I just need to heart s photo to add it. Might as well abandon Google altogether.
mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 10 months ago
Sounds like a Nest Frame is preparing for release to me
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
You shouldn’t be trusting google to store your photos anyways.
pastermil@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Or third party, really…
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
Well, you are going to have to trust someone to store your offsite backup unless you can afford a second house somewhere. It should be a backup service where you can encrypt the data before uploading it though.
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
Immich FTW
jeena@piefed.jeena.net 10 months ago
So I know that it has a API, but do 3rd party digital photo frames support it?
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
I mean you could put a stand on an old tablet. Personally I just put it on the TV.
PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
I just have an old tablet and I access Immich locally via browser and play a shuffled slideshow in full screen.
flightyhobler@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Here’s a slightly convoluted but effective way of syncing a dumb/simple digital frame with Google photos, by means of a raspberry pi zero
Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 months ago
sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
To be clear, users can still manually share Google Photos pics with connected frames.
It’s shitty that they removed apps ability to see all photos when authorized, though.
shrodes@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Sidenote, are these frames any good? Aura seems to advertise on a few podcasts I listen to but I’m curious how people in the real world feel about them
scotmartin@feddit.org 10 months ago
I can tell you it’s a very good digital picture frame for my needs that gets less convenient with this change by Google. I have one and gave one to my parents. This feature allows everyone with access to a shared Google photo album to contribute without an extra account or software and my parents get pictures of their grandchildren and what not. Also since the frame does nothing else but display pictures and play short videos it only needs to be plugged in and it does it’s thing. It is quite wonderful to be honest. It is a shame that Google is taking this joy away.
thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Fucking Google.
scotmartin@feddit.org 9 months ago
Got an email from Aura saying they are working with Google to keep the functionality. I wish they were working on a Nextcloud integration instead. Anything to protect themselves from Google I’m the future.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Because of course it won’t
NRay7882@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The enshittification must flow.