Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Adobe Says Artists Should Embrace AI If They Want to be Successful.

⁨149⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Dot@feddit.org⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://80.lv/articles/adobe-says-artists-should-embrace-ai-if-they-want-to-be-successful/

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Cryan24@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So company with vested interest thinks people should do thing that makes the company money, gotcha

    source
  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Adobe should embrace fucking itself

    source
    • xavier666@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Adobe should get comfortable with users not using AI

      source
  • n3cr0@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Artists embraced Adobe long enough. It’s time for a change.

    source
    • iorale@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
      [deleted]
      source
      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I recently moved to Affinity Photo with no complaints but I’m not a power user.

        source
  • paraphrand@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So we downvote here when we disagree with an article? Wouldn’t you wanna upvote it so other see the bullshit Adobe is spouting?

    source
    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I had the same confusion a while back… This is just an article… There’s no point in downvoting the post sharing the article…

      source
    • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Same dumb people that don’t want to put a like on news about war because they don’t like the fact people die

      source
  • bamfic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Adobe should embrace my dick

    source
    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      And my turds!

      source
  • qevlarr@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • over_clox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Sure, because screw artists with unique talent and style, let’s just have AI crank out the same style crap every day…

    I’m rapidly getting tired of this new AI art era, looks like the same shit every day anymore.

    Where’s the human factor anymore? Where’s the talent, where’s the skill?

    source
    • And009@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s not how we should see it. Digital artists spend a lot of time creating and trying different things. On the other hand we have people with different conditions who have ideas without the skills yo execute anything.

      This allows everyone to do more and quicker, increasing the earning potential. AI is useful as long as it levels out the playing field. It’s the malicious use we need to moderate and like drugs, thats a slippery slope.

      source
      • Pandemanium@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        When I am amazed by a piece of art, it’s because a person was able to conceive of a scene and then use techniques they’ve learned to bring that scene from their mind into reality. I think, “Wow, how did they decide to blend those colors together in such a way, and why? I wonder how hard it is to get that right? How long might it take me to learn the same technique?”

        But when I look at a piece of art made by AI, I think, disappointedly, “Oh, they didn’t. Nobody leaned the technique to paint this, there may not be any feeling behind it, or any point at all, other than ‘it looks good.’” It’s just not impressive.

        And I’m pretty sure that most people could learn how to prompt successfully in a matter of days or weeks. Real artists practice their craft for years, learning and perfecting techniques and often developing their own unique style.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • socphoenix@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        How does it increase earning potential? Best case it would flood the market with shit and result in less income due to either dilution of spending amongst thousands of idiots using “ai” or destroy the need for a market in the first place. If everything is ai why would I pay the “artist” instead of just going to stablediffusion or something similar?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    While they manage to build the crappiest image generator

    source
  • tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Hot take here: they’re not wrong. AI speeds up tons of processes that many traditional artists won’t be able to keep up, just like digital painting sped up tons of processes that traditional painting could not keep up.

    This doesn’t mean that traditional art will die. Physical art will surely find it’s niche and it will be sought after by collectors, for example. But in the commercial environment, faster is better and AI will be a factor.

    source
  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    One can look at art as either being about “the end result” or about the process of human expression. AI can produce the former (of varying quality), but not the latter.

    source
  • Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I too embrace Adobe Illustrator once but i’m not successful. Cool program though.

    Wait, wrong AI.

    source
    • And009@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s by far my favorite tool. Want to see what AI can actually do and not the crap they are pushing so far

      source
  • Deceptichum@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Let the Luddite’s not use it if they don’t want to, they’re only hurting themselves.

    source
    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      plagiarism != art

      No matter how many artists’ work is collected, combined, and regurgitated as algorithm puke, it’s still not art and never will be.

      source
      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Anyone spreading this misinformation and trying gatekeep being an artist after the avant-garde movement doesn’t have an ounce of education in art history. Generative art, warts and all, is a vital new form of art that’s shaking things up, challenging preconceptions, and getting people angry - just like art should.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Stop saying random things you don’t understand

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There’s no such thing as AI assist for decades and people still success creating masterpiece. It’s techbro and tech tycoon that hurts everyone.

      source
      • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        There were no movies for millennia, leaving people bereft of Seven Samurai.

        source
    • cerement@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Shantanu Narayen’s still not giving you a free license

      source
  • ulkesh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Adobe can fuck right off. They have become a completely shit company.

    source
  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Forget artists! I’ll just get Adobe AI and create the logo I would have paid an artist to make…if I had ever a need for a logo. What else does Adobe do anyways other than logos 😆.

    Goodbye artists, is also saying goodbye Adobe. They gotta thread lightly.

    source
  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    They prolly right. Peeps of da future prolly look back and be like, “damn! Art before 2022 really kinda sucked!”

    source
  • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So when do the artists get to move on to extending AI?

    source