And they expect you to do this for free?
Dreams come true
Submitted 1 month ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/68d71476-298c-4cc9-8de8-295c0f9c6ee6.jpeg
Comments
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
thejml@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Nah, they get “Exposure”!
/s
Rolando@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
For profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
And yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 month ago
[deleted]Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Maybe check the other comments.
Granite@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Feed the LLM with LLM generated books. No resentment at all!
gibmiser@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Jfc that’s gross
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Honestly sometimes I feel like I’m the only one on Lemmy who likes AI
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
AI absolutely has its benefits, but it’s impossible to deny the ethical dilemma in forcing writers to feed their work to a machine that will end up churning out a half assed version that also likely has some misinformation in it.
Jaderick@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And will likely take their professions
coffee_whatever@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Remember! It’s not AI hallucinations, it’s simply bullshit!
lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
AI as a technology is fascinating and can be extremely useful, especially in places like the medical field. AI as a product in its current state is nothing more than dystopian plagiarism.
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 month ago
The company I work for recently rolled up copilot and is have been a mixed bag of reactions, the less savvy user were first blowed up by the demonstration but then got exasperated when it didn’t worked as they tough (one of them uploaded an excel file and asked to some analysis it couldn’t do, and came to me to complain about it), but for me, and my team had worked great. I’ve been uploading some of my python and SQL scripts and asking for refactoring and adding comments, or uploading my SQL script and some example I found on stackoverflow and asking for it to apply the example method on my script.
I said to everyone that if they don’t know shit, the AI isn’t not going to help a lot, but if you have at least the basic, the AI would help you a lot.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
even just on simple stuff I asked it to generate a description on something like
if x then set z to null
and it returned
“this will set z to null if x is true or false”
like easy to edit, but you have to pay attention.
AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 1 month ago
I like AI. But I’m not sure I like the way we use it if it’s only to meet shareholders’ expectations or to be a tool for greedy people. What is your opinion concerning the way we seem to use AI in academic research?
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Found the black and white only guy.
Etterra@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So what you’re saying is, don’t beat the targets because fuck those guys. Understood.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Soylent Green is a lie anyway. Your need to “soylentify” half they population to feed the other half every year if it would be there only source of calories.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No, the point is that they’re just recycling the dissidents they were going to murder anyway.
AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
What’s the academic terminology for “go pound sand”?
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
How many of these books will just be totally garbage nonsense just so they could fulfill a rearranged quota.
Now the LLM are filled with a good amount of nonsense.
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
Just use the llm to make the books that the llm then uses, what could go wrong?
runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Someone’s probably already coined the term, but I’m going to call it LLM inbreeding.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 month ago
It can only go right because corporations must be punished for trying to replace people with machines.
poplargrove@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That would be terrible because they are both some of the best academic publishers in the humanities.