Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

28 Years Later: Danny Boyle’s New Zombie Flick Was Shot on an iPhone 15

⁨145⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨jeffw@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.wired.com/story/28-years-later-danny-boyles-new-zombie-flick-was-shot-on-an-iphone-15/

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • TommySoda@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’m glad they mentioned the release dates in the article because for a second there I was about to look up when “28 Weeks Later” came out to see if this mad lad waited 28 years to make the next movie. It came out in 2007 so it’s been 17 years. For some reason I felt like it was so much older than I remember, but it would have come out when I was a toddler if they did release it 28 years ago.

    … Anyway. I’m stoked to see the movie.

    source
    • dunz@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The first in the series, 28 Days Later, came out in 2002 actually

      source
      • TommySoda@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        True. I was comparing it to the second for some reason. But still, only 22 years and I’m just dumb. :)

        source
  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    But, why?

    source
    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because Apple is releasing the film.

      source
      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Sounds like a weird “we’ll finance you but you’re going to have to agree to our conditions” kind of deal.

        Odd that he found nobody else. Or maybe he found the challenge interesting.

        source
    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I wonder if it’s because 28 Days Later was shot on a handful of Canon XL-1’s, who h was a breakthrough as they were one of the first prosumer cameras that could pull off a film like that.

      Kind of a nod and a wink at the heritage of the story to shoot on consumer hardware.

      source
  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Next summer’s horror blockbuster is the biggest release yet to be shot with iPhones—and not even Apple’s latest model.

    But iPhone 15 is the latest model? The 16 Series is still the future model, until people can actually get them.

    source
    • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      wait was the 15 the one that was made of titanium and that was it

      source
  • jeffw@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Boyle is probably the biggest name to hop on the digital hype train early on, so this isn’t super shocking.

    source
    • vanontom@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Those early digital years were brutal. 28 Days Later looks worse with every passing year, probably never fixable (the cam’s resolution and quality was just too low).

      source
      • magikmw@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        But it was cheap, they even could afford the Oppenheimer actor back then.

        source
  • solrize@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Is this a big deal? Tons of movies have been shot with consumer camcorders which are probably worse than a modern phone camera.

    source
    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Maybe? Depends on how it’s used and if it looks good. Maybe they chose it because it looks a bit shit.

      The Creator garnered some attention because it looked great while being shot on a relatively inexpensive camera. I do think people would be really surprised at what you’d get with a gimbal mounted cellphone with a 360° camera in terms of special effects integration, but this might not be their route.

      source
      • solrize@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I looked at the article and it turns out the phones are in humongous housings with cine lenses. So not shot with phones in the way it might sound. Citizenfour (2013 best documentary Oscar) was mostly shot with a small camcorder that the filmmaker carried in her purse.

        source
  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Couldn’t even use a 16 Pro?

    /s

    source
    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Dude, read the article. Iphone 16 wasn’t even released 28 years ago, let alone the pro.

      source
      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        wooosh

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • dditty@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      For anyone curious:

      the particular model used to shoot was the iPhone 15 Pro Max. (Evidently, filming took place too early for Boyle and Mantle to get their hands on the new iPhone 16 series.)

      source
      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It was a joke

        source
  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s one way to guarantee I don’t watch your movie

    source
    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because of the camera they used? Really?

      source
      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Using an iPhone screams for attention – hard pass.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Why is there no 28 Months Later?

    source
    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because they didn’t make one.
      And the reason this one isn’t 28 months later is because it’s heck of a lot easier to make the 48 year old Cillian Murphy look like a convincing 54-year old than a 28 year old.

      source
    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because it wasn’t filmed by an Instagram mom with a toddler.

      source