It’s always a good day when private cars running costs go up, incentives people to drop it if it’s not absolutely needed
California auto insurance costs set to rise by 54%, new report says
Submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
https://abc7.com/post/california-auto-insurance-set-rise-by-54-percent-new-report-says/15190456/
Comments
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 months ago
And for those who it’s absolutely needed, just fuck them I guess?
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
In a sense that there needs to be a way to show that the status quo of only maintaining/expanding car infrastructure and providing nothing else as viable alternative is a dead one. Ridiculous insurance increases is part of that.
Fixed route and Accessible buses are possible even in smaller cities like Missoula, MT, population 70k, which provides fare-free transit service to its residents. In bigger cities, mass transit, urban and interurban rail needs to be explored and expanded today, else these problems will only get worse with no end in sight.
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Most of them it’s probably still not needed.
Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
America was bulldozed for the car, and now the bill is coming due.
Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Unfortunately in CA you are severly harmed by not having a car.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Car brained generalization about a huge and diverse state.
Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 2 months ago
You are severely harmed by not having a car *and being too apathetic and selfish to do anything about it
Sorted that for you
azimir@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
I agree with the cost of private cars in the US are detrimentally low. We have insanely subsidized gas, the car owners don’t pay for the cost of the roads (see federal gas tax being laughably low), and the side effect health hazards (noise, plastics dust, crash deaths) are considered normal despite the sheer suffering they cause.
That said, making cars more painful (cost/time) must be coupled with the work of rebuilding our infrastructure to modern standards. This means normal frequency mass transit (8 minute or less intervals), separated bike roads, and pedestrian safety put over car speed.
It can be done (there’s solutions to all of the superficial emotional jabs people seem to throw online), it just takes work to get our cities back from the clutches of the car only thinking we’ve been doing for 60+ years.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wouldn’t be an issue if public transit was made more available first.
Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Report says a large part of it is due to increases in severe weather events due to climate change so I guess you reap what you sow. Still doesn’t begin to capture the costs of car usage but at least it’s a start. Sucks for lower income people who need a car but we need things like this to push people away from car ownership and onto public transit otherwise the inertia of car dependence will stimy any efforts to improve public transit.
Inb4 “but public transit sucks right now I need a car”, yes it does but no politician is going to invest in making it better if everyone’s driving. We need to push people onto public transit so they can experience how bad it is and pressure there representatives to improve it. If we don’t the status quo will remain, the planet will get warmer, more severe weather events will happen and people will die.
psivchaz@reddthat.com 2 months ago
I keep arguing this and people don’t like it. The pain is necessary, we need people to be inconvenienced so they demand we solve the problem. Our greatest enemy is little stopgap solutions that kind of help people now at the cost of their future, like subsidizing oil to make gas prices cheaper.
It really sucks that people who are already having a hard time, people who don’t have money or time, are going to be the first to feel the pain. There’s definitely things we can do to help, but we all know that at least America isn’t going to do those things. I just don’t see a better way. Kicking the can down the road isn’t going to help them either, it’s just going to put them in a worse spot later.
Junkhead@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
wow what a really shitty and uncaring way to look at this good job for your lack of humanity, cunt.
Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
You have to have a pretty limited view of humanity to think this is uncaring. Higher insurance costs and people driving less is mostly just inconvenient for people in rich developed nations. Meanwhile the climate change mostly caused by the excessive pollution of those people is and will cause even more suffering due to severe weather events, drought, famine etc. This will disproportionately effect the most vulnerable people in developing and poor countries which have contributed way less to climate change. Look at a map of per capital emissions then look at one for countries that will suffer the most due to climate change and tell me how that is fair or humane.
But yeah, I’m unsympathetic, go on and tell a person dying of heat in India whose never even driven a car how I’m inhumane for not feeling more sad about you paying more for car insurance, cunt.
Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Reducing car usage will improve the world
JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Damn
Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
This is a pretty short article that links to: insurify.com/car-insurance/report/ Which has a full report
coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Wow it’s like half the people in California don’t have insurance 🤔🤔🤔
Eximius@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Uh, can you explain to a European how does that even work?
They cause lots of financial damages to you and just… not pay? File for bankcruptcy? Or?
coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Yeah they just disappeared into the woodwork, left me with almost a hundred thousand dollars in medical debt.
jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
there goes my chance to escape CA anytime soon. fuck all insurance companies.