[deleted]
Comment on The Fall of Stack Overflow
ericjmorey@programming.dev 11 months ago
I bet this is directly related to ChatGPT
argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
TheBat@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Can you write a code that would sort the input string from smallest to largest?
You would like to have it, wouldn’t you? You fucken nerd.
Papercrane@feddit.de 11 months ago
I thought chatgpt is kinda shit now since the newest updates
li10@feddit.uk 11 months ago
I think it’s overblown tbh.
In my experience it still makes good suggestions for most things, and is better than trying to phrase things in a way that Google likes, then trawling through irrelevant forum posts.
It’s only there to make suggestions, so if someone is taking its output without understanding and treating it like gospel then they’re an idiot who’s inevitably going to end up in a world of trouble.
If you take the suggestion, verify it with documentation, then make sure you actually understand it, chatGPT is a great tool.
FunderPants@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
ChatGPT has been a great tool to help me teach coding. It lets my students with a few.months experience write better code, as if they had a few extra months experience, but like you say it’s very easy to get in trouble with it. We had it generate some code to interface a web app with some me cloud triggers, and chatGPT suggested we put all the API keys / creds right there in the front end where anyone with “view source” could see them. It made for a really good lesson, actually, on the need to gain experience, understand what code does , and to validate with documentation.
Gork@lemm.ee 11 months ago
trawling through irrelevant forum posts.
This makes it worth it from just a time savings perspective. Also, describing it as trawling is very accurate lol. It takes a lot of trawling to get the answer you need, and even then sometimes it isn’t right because you’re relying on a single individual’s answer.
darkmarx@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I agree that it isn’t as good as it was. The last two updates have definitely decreased its effectiveness for multiple things, not just dev. It is still my starting point when looking for something. It is just not as good as it used to be.
Obviously, you can’t take what it gives at face value, but you shouldn’t do that from SO either. In general, I see faster results using GPT than I do with Google and SO. You can also extend the responses with any customization or changes specific to what you are trying to do, where you can’t with SO.
I’m not saying SO is bad. Not by any stretch. I still use it a lot. It just isn’t my starting point anymore.
varzaman@lemm.ee 11 months ago
ChatGPT isn’t that good at code generation lol.
ericjmorey@programming.dev 11 months ago
Doesn’t need to be good. Just good enough that people need SO less often. If GitHub Copilot gives a code suggestion, I don’t need to look up some syntax or some method I forgot. I’m reminded, and can see that it’s correct. No searching online required.
Gork@lemm.ee 11 months ago
It’s a little more decent than you give credit for. I use it all the time for easy generic subroutines and functions. It struggles a bit with specific, complex requests but is generally pretty versatile as a miniature code assistant. It’s good at catching human errors like loops starting or ending at the wrong specified integer, so I use it as a debugging tool.
SuperFola@programming.dev 11 months ago
People prefer having something generating shitty code and not checking it, instead of asking or searching on internet for a substantially better solution
li10@feddit.uk 11 months ago
Because forum posts are always full of accurate and helpful information?
In my experience it still makes good suggestions for most things, and is better than trying to phrase things in a way that Google likes, then trawling through irrelevant forum posts.
It’s only there to make suggestions, so if someone is taking its output without understanding and treating it like gospel then they’re an idiot who’s inevitably going to end up in a world of trouble.
If you take the suggestion, verify it with documentation, then make sure you actually understand it, chatGPT is a great tool.
wren@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Not necessarily, but at least there’s much more opportunity for other people to jump in and correct false info or expand upon something. It’s by no means a flawless system, but it’s better than only have one source of information
new_guy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
When we use forums there’s also an opportunity to correct (or be corrected) on how we deal with problems.
I’ve seen a few times people asking how to do X while they’re actually trying to do Y. ChatGPT would gladly direct them to the wrong path.
agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 11 months ago
If I’m honest, stackoverflow was always a shortcut for searching documentation to me.
Simple stuff like how do I turn an InputStream to a String again? I can’t remember it, but I know exactly what to look for, I’m just to lazy.
For that kind of stuff ChatGPT is almost perfect.
SuperFola@programming.dev 11 months ago
I didn’t say that people should go on the internet and pick the first forum post either ; that would be like trusting whatever chatgpt is handing you :p
My point was more on the “people are lazy” side of things, but yeah you have to stay critical of both chatgpt and forum posts.
li10@feddit.uk 11 months ago
I agree, I just think that those lazy people will do what they do regardless of where they get their info.
To butcher a saying; blame the craftsman, not the tools.
nous@programming.dev 11 months ago
Sadly there are so many people that take its output as gospel and don’t realise it can be wrong. So is a tool that commonly gets abused by people that don’t know how to use it.
gosling@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You mean shitty code which you can just check and ask them to change in almost real time, over posting your question on SO and waiting for months for an answer?
ofak@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Chatgpt is still a tool and it’s up to the user how to use it. If you google “bolognese recipe” you get one result; if you Google “traditional ragu from Bologna” you get another. Same for ChatGPT.
JesusTheCarpenter@feddit.uk 11 months ago
At least ChatGPT will not flag the question as duplicate.
Gork@lemm.ee 11 months ago
“I’m sorry, as an AI language model this question has been asked too many times and there is insufficient computer resources to handle your request. You’ve been temporarily silenced for 15 minutes.”
EatMyDick@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You are delusional and will be left behind if that is your view point. The code is usually largely accurate only needing a few tweaks. Easily one of the most powerful scaffolding and learning tool I’ve used in 25 years. Our developers embracing it are more efficient then ever and passing static analysis, owasp scans, coding standards just fine if not better than cranky old devs who think they couldn’t possibly be helped by a dumb machine.
Aidan@lemm.ee 11 months ago
You can have it generate shitty code and then compare it against examples it finds online to iterate that code. Also, it was trained on the whole internet, including those good solutions, and can often reproduce them on its own. but you have to tell it to do all that, rather than just asking for the code.