This is a frankly baffling comparison. I don’t think I could think 2 more different vehicles if I tried. Believe it or not, range is not the only thing people consider when purchasing a vehicle.
Comment on Tesla Cybertruck Owners Who Drove 10,000 Miles Say Range Is 164 To 206 Miles
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 months ago
i had a geo metro that had greater range.
so confusing why this exists.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Enk1@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s a truck, meant to tow and haul loads. If this is its range unladen then it’s hauling range is 50% or less of this range. Meaning a full charge gets you 82-103 miles, which makes it nearly useless as the thing it’s supposed to be: a truck.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Believe it or not, some people tow short distances, and some people use trucks as trucks without ever towing at all.
Enk1@lemmy.world 10 months ago
But Tesla specifically marketed this as a fully capable truck, which it is not.
joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
Ok, now try to do the things that trucks are typically used for in your geo metro. Towing, transporting construction tools and materials, etc.
I’m not defending Elon because I think the truck looks dumb and is over priced, but you gotta compare apples to apples.
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 months ago
i had a hitch on my 96 metro. so, yeah. and a geo metro totin a tiny trailer looks a hell of a lot less silly than that silver monstrosity
i do see your point. but i think it misses main the issue here; that this isnt a good vehicle let a lone truck.
joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
You’re still not comparing apples to apples. The people who actually need something like this (not this specifically because we both agree it’s bad) would not be using it to tow just a small trailer. I agree the cyber truck is bad but the comparison still makes no sense.
If you believe them, Tesla says the cyber truck can have a 2500lb payload and tow 11000 lbs. That’s a whole different ballgame than your geo metro which officially doesn’t even have a towing capacity.
Some people actually use trucks for their intended purposes instead of a status symbol.
Gonkulator@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Can we stop pretending people buying this monstrosity are going to use it like a farm implement. Lmao! Best chance of seeing one of these in the wild will be at a golf course clubhouse.
tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Yeah, but how long did it take you to refuel your metro? Surely it wasn’t faster than a few hours.
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Or never if it gets to cold for a while.
gregorum@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Ego
the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Feels like gas mileage peaked in the early 90s. Geo metro was only 3 cyl and sipped gas. my lil 92 eclipse for over 45mpg highway, i don’t even think it was rated that high.
Sovereign_13@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The early 90s was mostly a perfect storm for fuel economy.
You had the computing power available to make use of CAD and develop more aerodynamic designs with less significant overhead (i.e., doing it by hand).
EFI technology had matured and carburetors were broadly defunct, allowing more efficient operation in a broader range of environments.
The US had updated its archaic lighting regulations to allow for more aerodynamic headlight shapes.
A lot of the safety technology that adds weight to modern cars either hadn’t been developed yet or hadn’t trickled down to the average vehicle.
So you had a confluence of more efficient engines, more aerodynamic vehicles, and cars that were still small and relatively lightweight.
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 months ago
well, i actually had both a '92 3ycl (suzuki engine) and then later had a 4cyl monster metro. i think that was like a 96?
just dont turn on the ac
the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
just dont turn on the ac
Haha! Same. My eclipse was only rated 90hp from the factory, and i bought it with 150k miles. Good thing it was a stick
thejml@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I regularly get 43-46mpg highway with my 4 cylinder TLX, drops off like crazy atoms town though.
I agree that economy peaked In the 80’s-early 90’s, but if you take into account how much bigger, and heavier cars are today, we’re not that bad. Also, a lot of weight and size goes towards the superior crash safety in modern cars.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Feels like gas mileage peaked in the early 90s.
Probably in the early '00s but I mean that’s completely unsurprising considering the strides we’ve made in safety, comfort, and most importantly emissions since then.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Could you convey that you were both rich AND stupid just by driving your metro?
smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Just the one.