Comment on It's almost impossible to deny being an alcoholic without sounding like an alcoholic

• JJROKCZ@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Group therapy is pseudo-science?

  source

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Others have mentioned it, but to elaborate, Alcoholics Anonymous is not merely sitting in a circle and sharing your problems, but a belief system which requires you to submit to a higher power to move forward.

    source

    • medusa@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Knew a guy who insisted he wasn’t addicted, but he can’t go a day without attending an AA meeting. 40 years, non stop. Even when in other countries for work, he finds them. Left his own daughters wedding dinner to make it to one.

      He runs his own chapter where he lives. He’s had people follow the steps, sure, but some don’t. No matter how successful the latter are, he tears them apart for “not doing it right” and has turned his back on them for not following how he did it.

      source

      • SCB@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        My favorite quote on fanaticism applies here:

        “Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim” - George Santayana

        source
      • lud@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I didn’t know you could be addicted to AA meetings. I guess alcohol is a gateway drug to AA meetings, lol.

        source
    • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s 12 step. Not all AA is 12 step.

      source

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Almost All… But yes in recent years AA has tried to distance itself from the higher power ( God) rhetoric.

        AA is somewhat decentralized, and you will splinter groups.

        Also to clarify, 12 step is a process created by the founders of AA. It’s not a separate thing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • explodicle@local106.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I assume they mean this?

    In the past, some critics have criticized 12-step programs as pseudoscientific and “a cult that relies on God as the mechanism of action”. Until recently, ethical and operational issues had prevented robust randomized controlled trials from being conducted comparing 12-step programs directly to other approaches. More recent studies employing randomized and blinded trials have shown 12-step programs provide similar benefit compared to motivational enhancement therapy (MET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and were more effective in producing continuous abstinence and remission compared to these approaches.

    Source: Wikipedia

    source
  • maryjayjay@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You don’t know about AA, do you?

    source

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I know they get preachy but you can ignore that, many alcoholics get help from them without joining the cult of Christianity

      source

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You have a better grasp of them than the people down voting you.

        AA has done a lot to separate itself from religion in the past couple decades. But if you pay close attention, they use the exact same manipulation techniques used by religions to control their congregations.

        That said, AA does a LOT of good, and in my opinion they do genuinely have the best interests of their members at heart.

        source
  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    No, just AA

    source
• IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  There is no greater fucking idiot than the one who thinks a social gathering for discussion is subject to the rules of double-blind scientific testing. Watching some arrogant fucking shithead attempting to slander 12-stop programs as “not scientific” is hilarious because OF COURSE IT ISN’T SCIENTIFIC!! IT MAKES NO CLAIMS TO BE.

  source

  • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s all fine and dandy until you get court ordered to attend these meetings as if it were a scientifically proven method of quitting drinking. It’d be like doing something bad and then being court ordered to attend church so that you can “gain a moral compass.”

    source

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That I agree with…but that’s a criminal justice problem

      source
    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Out of curiosity, where are people being remanded to AA specifically?

      Having some experience in those circles. Courts often order “recovery programs” not AA, usually some form outpatient/inpatient group therapy, run by licensed therapists.

      source

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        In the US, you can have court ordered AA f as punishment for alcoholic related crimes. This is sometimes given as an option over jail time or fines, so the legality is questionable, but people in those situations rarely know their rights or want to extend the court process.

        source
  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It makes no claims to be scientific… so it’s measurably worthless?

    You seem to be agreeing my dude

    source

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Nope. It works for those it works for. It is social, not scientific. There is no possible way to measure it’s effectiveness because you can’t monitor the entire lives of everyone who has wandered into a meeting. For myself, I had no intention of quitting but went ro a meeting because a feiend asked me to. I never drank again after my very first meeting in 2004. Many, many others had relapse repeatedly. Others did not. But there is no way to know what the success rate is because nobody knows who we are or if we’ll ever drink again before we die. It is a program of suggestion only, with no requirements.

      source

      • DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Damn bro rather be me without legs than you with millions you disgust me

        source
      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You measure these things with surveys and interviews and design statics. AA claims to have success and relapse numbers, but I’d prefer independently run ones. Not everything scientific needs to be or can be a double blind trial.

        If it’s measurably, it can be improved. Even if AA works, does it have a better success rate then quitting cold turkey? Even if works, are there things that can be changed to make it work even better?

        You’re a very bizarre form of evil.

        You sound like you’re in a cult.

        source