Man these people forget the days where a Spotify subscription price would get you 1 CD. I remember cause I would spend half my paycheck on music. I'm just sitting here happy for services like Spotify and YouTube in my life. I remember a time when music and information was much harder to obtain (even illegally).
Comment on Spotify re-invented the radio
Rayspekt@kbin.social 8 months ago
Well, if you don't pay with money, you're paying with your attention. Do you think they create this huge service just for funsies?
Tbf, out of all media streaming services across movies, series, and music, Spotify has the highes bang-for-your-buck. It's still like Netflix at that time when there was only Netflix and you could watch almost everything on one platform. I still buy records that I like on physical media like vinyl, but Spotify is such a great deal for convenient listening to all music out there.
Blackout@kbin.social 8 months ago
thejml@lemm.ee 8 months ago
But if you bought the CD you actually owned something. Stop paying for the services and you have nothing if all you used was spotify/YouTube/pandora. I gave up on paying for streaming years ago and spend the same amount monthly on purchasing music. I get CDs, either new or used. I’ve amassed a collection and I don’t need Internet or monthly charges to play them.
SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 8 months ago
But I don’t want to own it. I don’t want to amass a collection of CDs taking up space somewhere. Been there, done that. I have a large collection of ripped mp3s from CDs I bought in the 90s and early 2000s (I’ve long since disposed of the physical media). I haven’t clicked on a single one of them in years, I just keep them for nostalgia sake and because they take relatively little space.
I just occasionally want to listen to music sans commercials or annoying DJs wasting my time. For the cost of 1 CD a month my entire family can listen to almost anything they desire, at any time, without hassles (on Pandora in our case but I assume the economics are similar).
Same thing with movies, honestly. I watch them once and move on. There’s a small handful I like enough to rewatch and I do own those.
I get the whole, we don’t own anything anymore, argument and I mostly agree with it (see my massive Steam library). I just want both options to be viable. Streaming for ephemeral entertainment and actual ownership for the things I choose to keep.
Blackout@kbin.social 8 months ago
We all have our preferences and I enjoy the quantity of music I can get in a heartbeat. It really sucked when you were 16 and spent $15 on a CD that sucked because there was no way to hear it ahead of time.
thejml@lemm.ee 8 months ago
My rule was always “buy it if there are at least 3 songs I know & like”. Only really had a few disappoint. I used to hang out at used CD stores though. I got so many for $2.50 or $5. Even a few gems for $1.
Rayspekt@kbin.social 8 months ago
Valid point, but commuting with my turntable to listen to my sick vinyls on the go is a pain in the ass. Also moving sucks ass when you have a metric fuckton of sensitive vinyl to move. Owning stuff also has its downsides. Also no way I'm digitizing my vinyls and cutting them and shit to listen to them on the go, ain't nobody got time fo dat.
I gave up on CDs roughly 15 years ago because I don't like the format compared to vinyl (small album art, plasticy jewelcases, ...).
small44@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You owned the music when you buy it. With multiple backups the risks of losing it it very minimal but with spotify or other streaming services, if you have to reduce your expenses you completely lose the access to the music till you pay again. Spotify always grey out songs too so even when you pay you may not have access to the some of the music you want to listen to
Rayspekt@kbin.social 8 months ago
I feel you, the value from Spotify is enormous. I can sift through ten different bands in no time just because I decided that I want to look up a new genre that I may or may not be totally into by the end.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Kid: goes to school
Police: THAT’S ILLEGAL
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 months ago
I remember cause I would spend half my paycheck on music
Lmao
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Hahaha seriously
I remember my 56k ass was a Napster pro
Blackout@kbin.social 8 months ago
I was 16 before Napster existed. It didn't come out til I was 19. You guys are so ignorant and self centered. Claim you care about the artists but you want it all for free and when Spotify makes things difficult on you your solution is to pirate everything. We pirated when music was far more expensive than it was now. Software cost $1000s and there wasn't a $60 monthly option. People actually lived on minimum wage back then and it was $4.25/hr.
AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I know not everyone will agree, but I think YouTube premium is the better bang-for-buck service. $3 more per month than Spotify and includes YouTube Music premium and YouTube Premium. So all the music and ad-free YouTube.
EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 8 months ago
Except what YT Premium does is easily doable with free tools.
BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 8 months ago
Only so long as Google decides to continue serving content for free to people who contribute nothing to their bottom line, which isn't guaranteed to last.
Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 months ago
Anyone that thinks Google's WebDRM is going to stop with ads is a fool.
HKayn@dormi.zone 8 months ago
*with free tools from thankless efforts.
EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 8 months ago
You can donate to projects you like tho
Kbobabob@lemmy.world 8 months ago
An argument could easily be made for Spotify as well. There are plenty of options for streaming music for free to your device with download support. Just about anything can be done for free if people are willing.
EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 8 months ago
YT is just the more egregious example of this imo.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 months ago
Sure, for now. YouTube is cracking down on ad-blockers, don’t think they’ll let those free tools work forever…
SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
YouTube is basically the same price as Spotify (only 12 cents more actually), so even more bang for my buck, specially for family plans.
CO_Chewie@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I’m currently in a three month trial due to the value (music streaming and ad free you tube), but coming from Pandora YT Music’s radio algorithm sucks sooooo bad. One of my first plays was a foo fighters album and now all the stations I create have alt/grunge in them. It’s making it really hard to consider staying.
shectabeni@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Surprising to see any suggestions on here for YouTube Premium. I have been lucky enough to be on a family plan for years and it’s honestly great. Sometimes, it’s just easier not to deal with having to hack around things to make them usable.
AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Family is one of the biggest reasons. A huge part of it for me was minimizing at least SOME of the ads my kids would be exposed to.
Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I did not agree when I had both premium, I did not agree when I had YT light and Spotify premium, and I do not agree today.
Context: I only use YT for its main service; streaming video. I never tried YT music because I already had music streaming set up in a way that worked for me.
AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I mean, if you are paying for two services but don’t use one by choice, sure I can see the value not being there.
Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Nope, fuck em. Like why pay for any of this bullshit when I can just steal and/or scrape for it?
Havald@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You’re not hurting the companies, you’re hurting the artists. I’m not saying don’t pirate at all, especially from artists like Taylor swift. But maybe if you’re listening to a small artist, especially if they’re independent, consider buying their cd.
AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 8 months ago
If the option is Spotify or pirating, you’re really not hurting indie artists. They don’t make shit from streaming.
mPony@kbin.social 8 months ago
hey now I make 10 bucks a year from streaming royalties. I can almost buy a fancy coffee with a shot of booze for that. Oh the life of an indie music artist.
Havald@lemmy.world 8 months ago
There is still a difference between basically nothing and literally nothing. Spotify is better than pirating and CDs/vinyl/digital directly from them is better than Spotify.
Blackout@kbin.social 8 months ago
The last album I bought was Ty Segal's latest. I have seen him live at least a dozen times and bought roughly $600 worth of limited releases and shirts at these shows. I "discovered" him thru Spotify's Discover Weekly playlist that automatically puts together music they think I will like.
I think all the free users are the problem. They don't want to pay for the service, they complain about ticket and merch prices at shows and hardly contribute anything to the artists themselves. They blame Spotify when it's Ticketmaster and the labels they should direct their anger towards. Not paying users like me.
dojan@lemmy.world 8 months ago
According to this blogpost or whatever it is Spotify basically doesn’t pay artists, so if there’s a niche/local/whatever band you like, the best way to show support is by buying their tracks/records directly from them.
I think for smaller artists, Spotify is less for revenue and more for exposure, hoping that your music can reach new listeners.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“I can’t pay you in cash, but I’ll get you exposure!”
“woah” as they hold up the piece of paper that says ‘exposure’, “this is worthless!”
(kinda meme kinda serious, as I know nobody who hears an artist on a streaming service and then does anything past listen to them on said streaming service, netting the artist effectively nothing)
Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
We’re talking about Pennies. I go to their shows and buy merch (preferably from their websites). The artists see more direct money that way.
BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 8 months ago
Spotify is not actually profitable, not that I imagine you actually care about discussing such annoyances as facts. I imagine you probably wouldn't personally love the idea of working while actively losing money for the privilege?
I guess Kbin is getting a reputation for having such wild takes as "Stealing isn't exactly great," so I'm glad to see I chose a Fediverse home wisely.
Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Y’all have some of the most self centered takes. And if it’s not self centered, it’s either dumb or pro-capitalist.
BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 8 months ago
If your definition of resisting capitalism is apparently "not paying for things that other people provide for you", I think that says more about you than it really says about economics.
To then call me the self-centered one is actual comedy, so thanks for that laugh.
uberkalden@lemmy.world 8 months ago
What’s with the instance hate. It’s fucking cringe.
Rayspekt@kbin.social 8 months ago
Yeah if you can't pay for Spotify then don't, I get you. It doesn't make their subscription offer any worse, though, if you decide on pirating.
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 months ago
I’d rather vote for Deezer. Costs the same, but you also get lossless (16-bit 44.1kHz FLAC) audio.
By the way, free-mp3-download.net rips songs from Deezer. And if you don’t like spending storage, you could self-host your own Navidrome server, though I get that may not be convenient.
poopkins@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I need 48-bit 96kHz raw PWM otherwise my ears can’t tolerate it. I can hear the difference in the waveforms.
uberkalden@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Careful, this same take when discussing YouTube ads will draw the ire of the internet
cedarmesa@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Spotify thanks you for defending our platform and more importantly the investment portfolios of our shareholders. Share this email for one free month of spotify premium.
HKayn@dormi.zone 8 months ago
Surely you have a better explanation for why Spotify isn’t giving you the full service for free.
KmlSlmk64@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Graph showing quarterly Spotify free vs premium users and their gross profit from it. While there are 317m free users, they bring in 0.4bn USD profit, whereas 210m premium subscribers bring in 11.9bn USD profit
HKayn@dormi.zone 8 months ago
Your point?
Rayspekt@kbin.social 8 months ago
Yeah don't use it if you don't want to, idc. But you might accept the thought that there are people that think the deal Spotify puts on the table is good.
porkins@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Spotify is not profitable nor ever has been. It accrued $4B in additional debt last year. The business is subject to high royalty fees. As a competitor, I just leave free Spotify running all day on mute since they lose money from every subscriber. The royalties are the same whether they make money or not on the customer. It is wise of them to more aggressively convert people to paid plans, but I’m sure that their margins are razor thin.
Anamnesis@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You individually are a competitor to Spotify?
RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
I hum in the shower 😎👉👉
porkins@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Not sure why my comment was deleted, but no. I work for a corporate competitor or them. Spotify is a public company, so it is plain to see that they are not profitable and have never been.