Comment on Federated End-to-End Encrypted Messaging is Coming Soon

• Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That’s what I mean.
  The headline is a lie.

  source

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If I say tacos coming soon, it doesn’t mean I invented tacos, just that there will be new tacos I guess

    source

    • veeesix@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I heard this is the line for tacos.

      source

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Lines long as 2, and they only come three ways. Steak, cilantro, lime, cheese with your choice of sauce… Chicken chipotle mixed Mexican blend cheese, and cilantro lime, rice-cauliflower.

        Sides are open as a bar, self serve.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • whelk@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I’ll take one

      source
    • umbrella@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      i’m suddenly hungry for tacos

      source

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Then I charge you with naming you favorite genre at least. Barbacoa?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      But we already have tacos.
      If you say “Tacos are coming soon”. And we already have tacos. I’d say “What do you mean? Tacos are already here. Do we need more tacos?”

      source

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Do you just ask if we need more tacos? The answer is always yes… Where is your insatiable hunger?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If anyone ever asks “Do we need more tacos?” it becomes your responsibility to slap this individual. Because obviously yes. The answer is ALWAYS yes. Always more tacos. Always.

        source
  • ageedizzle@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Matrix is not really integrated into the ActivityPub protocol the same way DMs usually are. I would have to open a separate application to message you on Matrix, I can’t just click on your profile and shoot you a DM (or can I?).

    source

    • knova@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You cannot, two totally different protocols

      source

      • ageedizzle@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        There you go. So I think adding DMs to ActivityPub would add an extra level of convenience 

        source
    • Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      ActivityPub is only one of a number of federated protocols.
      One notably unsuited to instant messaging.

      source
  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I, too, am often pissed at clickbaity, exaggerated, deliberately ambiguous headlines.

    The subtitle makes it clear though: this is about ActivityPub, which has grown into the #1 federation protocol I guess.

    source
  • deadsuperhero@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s not, the demo video actually shows that being one such use case. There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a chat service in ActivityPub. But this can also apply to statuses, media, all kinds of other stuff.

    source
  • Vittelius@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    No it’s not. Matrix isn’t part of the Fediverse. It doesn’t use ActivityPub and there is no interop with any other Fediverse service.

    That doesn’t make Matrix bad, it just makes it it’s own thing.

    source

    • Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      ActivityPub isn’t the only way to be federated. Email is federated. Email isn’t ActivityPub. Matrix is no different.

      source