steganography markers
On top of everything else, this isn’t even the correct term, nor does its meaning match the sentiment you wish to convey.
Comment on YSK that Elena Kostyuchenko is an extraordinarily brave woman.
j4k3@piefed.world 23 hours ago
Huh. She has several steganography markers reflective of generative AI in the image. Obviously those are based on traits that occur naturally, but the combination of traits here are all in harmony with a certain state of QKV hidden layers model alignment. The background, shadowing, overall color profile in CMYK, eye color, freckles on each area of skin, clothing color and pattern, flatness of the hair on the head, the strands of hair extending over the background, the face shape/nose shape/jaw line/dimples/eyebrow shatten combined are especially curious.
steganography markers
On top of everything else, this isn’t even the correct term, nor does its meaning match the sentiment you wish to convey.
I get weird SEO campaign content vibes when I see stuff like this from relatively new users.
Sure
Bot
I’m interested to know how you analysed it. Is there a piece of software you used?
Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kostyuchenko
otacon239@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
“Everything is AI” is almost as annoying as everything actually being AI. It’s the modern r/nothingeverhappens.
whaleross@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
It’s the new “#first” to call everything AI. People that have nothing to contribute but need some attention.
j4k3@piefed.world 23 hours ago
I never said anything was a conspiracy. I just point out something interesting. How you perceive that is entirely up to you. I see it as just as likely that her likeness was used in training or is present in substantial numbers within the original stable diffusion unet. Being dichotomous and dogmatic just pushes intelligence out, in favor of ever worsening echo chambers. If pointing out such anomalies is met with dogmatic stupidity, this is far too stupid of a placed for me to waste time engaging.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 22 hours ago
This isn’t an airport, no need to announce your departure.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
Oh I love this response.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
That’s probably my least favorite way of refusing to take responsibility for your own words.
meco03211@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Huh. J4k3 has several ignoramus markers reflective of generative AI in the text. Obviously those are based on traits that occur naturally, but the combination of traits here are all in harmony with a certain state of ID10T hidden layers model alignment. The background, sentence structure, overall stupidity profile in STFU, word choice on each area of the post, font color and pattern, flatness of the tone, the strands of spittle extending over the slacked jaw combined are especially curious.
mycodesucks@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
If you seriously had any interest in engagement, you wouldn’t be using EXTREMELY domain specific language in an attempt to sound smarter than everyone else. You’d be explaining, in laymen’s terms, exactly what your suspicion is in an accessible way the way ANY real expert in their field is trained to do from day one. Instead you’re either an actual expert who is extremely poor at the communicative aspect of your job, or a troll here to sow dissent and cloud the conversation. Either way, I’m appreciative that you read the room and decided to leave of your own initiative. It shows a level of awareness neither of your prior posts had, and it’s refreshing.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
He basically just said it looks a lot like the picture could be made by an AI. Which is completely irrelevant since it clearly isn’t, something you could find out in five seconds by looking her up.
k0e3@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
And people are just pointing out how stupid you are. Sounds fair to me.
Hawke@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Bye Felicia