logicbomb
@logicbomb@lemmy.world
- Comment on Maybe the RAM shortage will make software less bloated? 1 day ago:
Also, it goes without saying that tons of competent people work at Microsoft, despite OP saying exactly the opposite.
- Comment on Bruh... 3 days ago:
One option is to speak like him, but choose to remain mute for the rest of your life.
- Comment on Through gritted teeth, Apple and Google allow alternative app stores in Japan 6 days ago:
Now we just need these laws worldwide.
- Comment on BacK iN MY dAys 1 week ago:
fancy cabinet
Maybe this is the old man in me talking, but every time I’ve had any sort of lighting in my PC or RGB in my mouse, for example, it’s just been distracting. Nobody but me ever even looks at my PC, and now, every time I see a fancy cabinet, it just looks like an eyesore to me.
- Comment on 1 week ago:
Let’s see if the rats want to play global thermonuclear war.
- Comment on YSK that Elena Kostyuchenko is an extraordinarily brave woman. 1 week ago:
I don’t wish to make too many tangential top-level comments, so I am declaring this the tangential thread, but all I can think of is that America is on a path where someday we’ll also have journalists who will literally have to choose between the truth and their own safety. We already have so many who choose lies over the truth when their safety is not questioned.
- Comment on YSK that Elena Kostyuchenko is an extraordinarily brave woman. 1 week ago:
steganography markers
On top of everything else, this isn’t even the correct term, nor does its meaning match the sentiment you wish to convey.
- Comment on If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes? 1 week ago:
America was founded on the concept of no taxation without representation.
- Comment on xkcd #3180: Apples 2 weeks ago:
Next experiment will be the Banach–Tarski paradox.
- Comment on Biblically accurate tree angel 2 weeks ago:
Next year, they’re using a scientifically accurate star.
- Comment on That's interesting 2 weeks ago:
“If you only have a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail.”
But even then, I find it alarming that he doesn’t seem to know about the internet, libraries, or even just books, in general.
- Comment on I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right. 2 weeks ago:
It’s more like the ancient phenomenon of spaghetti code. You can throw enough code at something until it works, but the moment you need to make a non-trivial change, you’re doomed. You might as well throw away the entire code base and start over.
And if you want an exact parallel, I’ve said this from the beginning, but LLM coding at this point is the same as offshore coding was 20 years ago. You make a request, get a product that seems to work, but maintaining it, even by the same people who created it in the first place, is almost impossible.
- Comment on New Community Rule: "No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports." 3 weeks ago:
For me, the important thing is that this is a vibrant community.
That means that from the mods’ perspectives, they don’t get too loaded down with moderation work, or need to defend themselves and create friction with the community.
It also means that when people want to contribute to the community, they’re not afraid of what the mods will say. If they post without reading the rules, like probably most people do, it’s really the poster’s fault. But if they are afraid to post even after reading the rules, then I think that has a freezing effect on the community.
As for people who are looking for loopholes, I think they’re trying to make the mods’ lives harder, and so I don’t really think they’re worth worrying too much about. They’ll probably get banned sooner or later because that is the attitude of a troll.
Just my opinion. I’ve never been a mod, and I don’t think I could handle that responsibility. I just try to be empathetic with everybody involved.
- Comment on New Community Rule: "No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports." 3 weeks ago:
You’re right. One problem is, even though mods already have the power, specifically saying in the rules that the criteria is subjective sounds like something that a mod would make when they are tired of having to explain their moderation choices.
They can just say that it was low-effort, and problem solved. They don’t need to explain themselves, right?
But when the rules are vague, I think they’ll end up with more complaints from people who have different criteria of low-effort from the mods. This sort of interaction leads to accusations of mods power-tripping.
If the mods can nail down exactly what is low-effort, like, “X will always get removed. Z will never get removed unless it violates other rules. Y may be at risk of the moderator’s mood. You have been warned.” If they nail things down a bit more, then they will probably make things easier for themselves in the long-run than just keeping things vague.
Plus, if the rules are not vague, then people can discuss them safely when the rules are changed. When rules are vague, people will simply be upset that moderation was sprung on them, and everything will be discussed while people are upset. My belief is that people best discuss things while calm, and not while experiencing one person having power over another.
- Comment on Bread mold 3 weeks ago:
if you don’t need penicillin does it actually help you at all?
No, it has virtually no chance to help you, and most probably can only hurt you.
First, it kills indiscriminately. If you’re not sick, what are you killing? Your own healthy gut flora. That’s what.
Second, what if you are slightly ill? Guess what? It still probably won’t help. Doctors don’t just throw penicillin at you in random amounts. They prescribe a specific dose that has been shown to be effective. Having one untested dose of unknown quantity isn’t going to help.
Third, when you’re given antibiotics, you are told to take it over a number of days, and to take the entire amount, even if you feel better. They do this for several reasons, but one of the reasons is that, if you only kill some of the bacteria, but not enough of them, the remaining bacteria have a small chance to evolve to become resistant to antibiotics. By taking antibiotics without the guidance of a doctor, you have a small chance of making yourself even more ill with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. I want to emphasize that this is a very small chance, but unlikely things will happen when given enough chances.
- Comment on One women's theory on the ballroom, pulled by Larry Ellison. Thoughts? 3 weeks ago:
I’m not saying that they’re not building a data center there, but her evidence seems to be that it’s far more expensive than the most expensive federal buildings and that the administration is lying and saying that the ball room is larger than it actually is.
Two things that describe exactly what we’ve seen Trump do in the past. Trump may overspend on decoration because he has to make everything gold, or because he’s pocketing the extra money. Trump’s felony convictions were related to his lying about the square footage of his properties, in signed contracts, that they were bigger than they actually were.
- Comment on The Algorithm That Detected a $610 Billion Fraud: How Machine Intelligence Exposed the AI Industry’s Circular Financing Scheme 3 weeks ago:
I haven’t read the article, but I have read previous accusations of the same thing, so I assume it’s the same.
Basically, the new AI companies are all losing money, but they are all investing big money in each other which makes it look like the industry is doing well.
- Comment on YSK that the First-Past-The-Post voting system allows a political party to gain an absolute majority with a minority of the votes 3 weeks ago:
Did you make a similar comment to OP, who only spoke negatively of a well-used and well-understood system?
What is OP’s proposed alternative? What’s a realistic plan to get there?
Here’s what OP said in the body of their post.
Most european countries use 2 round elections or proportional representation.
Although I’m not sure when they wrote that. The post was edited, so it’s possible that it wasn’t there when you first saw the post, and didn’t re-check the post before writing this comment.
- Comment on YSK that the First-Past-The-Post voting system allows a political party to gain an absolute majority with a minority of the votes 3 weeks ago:
What is your reason for saying that?
Just saying something negative makes it seem like it’s a bad idea, but that just encourages people not to change at all. A voting system that tries to satisfy the Condorcet criteria will be far better than any FPTP system.
It’s easier to tear down than it is to build up. What’s your proposed alternative?
- Comment on DAE name their characters by their official name? 4 weeks ago:
I think that there is a time factor and a complication factor. Like the longer the game lasts and the fewer characters available to name, the more people who will name and customize characters.
I wonder how many people completed Skyrim with the name “Prisoner”, though.
- Comment on xkcd #3174: Bridge Clearance 4 weeks ago:
Title text:
A lot of the highway department’s budget goes to adjusting the sign whenever the moon passes directly overhead.
- Comment on xkcd #3174: Bridge Clearance 4 weeks ago:
The sign on the left is mounted on a pole that extends 10 ft 6 in above the ground.
- Comment on "Jurassic" Park 4 weeks ago:
Welcome to Cretaceous Park!
- Comment on Assumptions 4 weeks ago:
I’ve seen videos of horses and deer eating small animals. I don’t remember which was which but one just picked like a pigeon up off the ground and started chewing.
Anyways, the point is that the herbivores we know today will often eat meat if it’s an easy meal. There’s no reason to think that a brachiosaurus would be any different.
- Comment on It really is 4 weeks ago:
Remember that story that some egghead science person decided to look closely at their own back yard and discovered a bunch of new species?
This reminds me of that. We’d assume that it’s more rare to find some unknown animals in the sea than it is to find some unknown animals in your suburban backyard. Or at least I would think that’s a natural way to think. But it’s really not that different. If you walk through your backyard, you might step on an animal that is rarer than the chirodectes maculatus.
- Comment on The problem with common names 5 weeks ago:
Wikipedia continues to not disappoint:
The name ‘hellbender’ probably comes from the animal’s odd look. One theory claims the hellbender was named by settlers who thought “it was a creature from hell where it’s bent on returning.” Another rendition says the undulating skin of a hellbender reminded observers of “horrible tortures of the infernal regions.” In reality, it’s a harmless aquatic salamander.
And this:
Other vernacular names include snot otter, lasagna lizard, devil dog, mud-devil, mud dog, water dog, grampus, Allegheny alligator, and leverian water newt.
Lots of fabulous nicknames there.
- Comment on The crusade against Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and so-called "tankies" 5 weeks ago:
I often feel a strong desire to downvote in retaliation to other people’s downvotes, so I certainly don’t expect others to be perfect when I’ve probably not perfectly lived up to my own ideals in the past. The real answer, I think is to remove downvotes, even from the underlying message formats, and somehow rework the “report” button so that it’s not a burden for mods to deal with. Maybe something like Slashdot’s community moderation could ease the burden.
- Comment on The crusade against Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and so-called "tankies" 5 weeks ago:
Kolanaki downvoted your comment asking what they meant, but didn’t even respond. That was what my link showed. I don’t think their initial comment explained itself, and so downvoting a simple question without responding to it is simply arguing in bad faith.
Basically a comment downvote is an attempt to silence the person who wrote the comment.
My personal opinion is that every comment downvote, outside of comments that deserve to be removed by mods, is done in bad faith. A comment downvote is for things you are sure are spam or trolling. That sort of thing. Using it as a “disagree” button is a bad faith use.
I think most people are unaware that comment votes are public information, and so if you look at how they vote, often, all of their hypocrisy will be laid bare.
- Comment on I wonder 5 weeks ago:
A seagull alone may be dumb and have very little memory of the past, but I am sure that A Flock of Seagulls can remember all the way back to the 1980s.
- Comment on The crusade against Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and so-called "tankies" 5 weeks ago:
I agree. Anybody who comments or even votes on comments in bad faith isn’t worth much.