She makes money exploiting these people, promoting their fantasies. It’s fucked from both sides.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
You cultivate these parasocial relationships with people online who pay you for them. Like.
You should be safe attending an event like this. And doing so doesn’t give anyone the right to you, to hurt you, or anything about you beyond what choose to share.
At the same time the entire streaming thing seems designed to prey upon lonely maladjusted weirdos, so while I’m not shocked that someone tried soemthing like this (I am shocked at how shitty the security was here), this isn’t super surprising.
The entire thing feels exploitative and gross for everyone involved, both the streamers and the people watching / paying them.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
Doesn’t she just stream herself playing video games?
timeghost@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
“See? She’s doing it again! She’s sexually harassing me!” – Beavis
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I concur.
someacnt@sh.itjust.works 21 hours ago
? Watching people playing games in your spare time is “being exploited”? Do we have to play games to enjoy them?
starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
I hate to break this to you but many people who watch female streamers are not there for the games, and many streamers encourage this parasocial behavior (I don’t think emiru really does, but I don’t really watch twitch anymore). Even for male streamers I’ll see people treating donators like they’re friends and being really encouraging (only when they donate a message though). If you are one of the people who just pops in and out and watches streamers who don’t do this, then you and that streamer are not who he is talking about.
RustyShackleford@programming.dev 1 day ago
You cultivate these parasocial relationships with people online who pay you for them. Like.
Like.
“Like” fucking what?!
"Like, why the fuck would anyone think a one-word sentence with only the word ‘LiKe.’ can convey any meaning whatsoever?
TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
Hey buddy, language rules are constructed after the fact to EXPLAIN a language, they aren’t set by the king of English to be followed.
People use “like” in real life just as they did here all the time, and people understand them. Therefore it’s language.
You’re the one that is wrong here both technically and morally.
You are the one who is dumb in this situation, not the people who have a slightly different dialect than you
RustyShackleford@programming.dev 19 hours ago
I’m not your “buddy”, guy.
“Like.”, as a single word sentence, especially when written or typed, conveys nothing. Inferring something about what the user of the word is trying to say with that one word dilutes any meaning in what was previously stated.
People use “like” in real life just as they did here all the time, and people understand them. Therefore it’s language.
That’s my point. It’s language, yes, but used stupidly. People use “like” as one sentence in real life and sound dumb when they do it. Same as “just saying”. Neither convey any further meaning or elucidation of a previous point.
You’re the one that is wrong here both technically and morally.
While language certainly evolves and I wouldn’t call myself the “King of English”, as you say, I am perfectly and “morally” within my rights to opine, loudly even, that the use of “like” as a one-word sentence is (once more, with feeling) stupid and meaningless.
In the words of Charles Bronson, “Take those pearls you’re clutchin’ and shove 'em up your ass.”
You are the one who is dumb in this situation, not the people who have a slightly different dialect than you
This is not a matter of “dialect”. It’s a matter of shitty usage of words that don’t literally, metaphorically, allegorically, or mean anything, in context.
I’ve been called worse than “dumb”. Your opinion of what I am in this situation means precisely dick-cheese to me. I don’t know if you’re trying to change my mind, but if you want to call me “dumb”, knock yourself out.
When you get diagnosed with cancer, I hope your doctor, with all the vocal fry they can muster, says, “So you’re, like, gonna die. Like. Just saying.”
I said what I said and I, again, happy to die on this hill.
Like.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 hours ago
In the words of Charles Bronson, “Take those pearls you’re clutchin’ and shove 'em up your ass.”
You don’t think getting upset over “Like.” is pearl clutching?
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
LIKE. POCKET SAND. K-CH CH CH CHAWWWW
Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
What?
RustyShackleford@programming.dev 1 day ago
Like.
Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Sure.
Just pointing out that one word sentences can, and do convey meaning. Often lots of meaning.
I glommed onto that like too, but ignored it and chose not to be a dickhead. Just saying.
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
That is our word, you have, like, no right to use it
apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 day ago
I guess it would have been more correct to write “Like-.” since that would make it clear that it was an unfinished idea. I interpreted it both as being too exasperated to finish the thought, or as leading into the following paragraph.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
At the same time the entire streaming thing seems designed to prey upon lonely maladjusted weirdos
So does a place like Hooters. They’re not specifically designed to prey on maladjusted weirdos. They’re audience is older, lonely men. Not all lonely older men are maladjusted weirdos.
It’s “gross” to you because you think being single, older and a man is a red flag in and of itself bad. And saying it “exploits everybody” denies women agency, like opposing strip clubs or prostitution.
ieGod@lemmy.zip 21 hours ago
Don’t think the comparison is valid. While there will be creepers at hooters, they are more likely to already be social and accustomed to the norms. They’re out and about. Whereas there’s an undeniable mass of socially inept users that streaming specifically caters to. They have zero concepts of socially appropriate behaviour and interactions.
The older single man angle has nothing to do with it.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 19 hours ago
I don’t know if they’re accustomed to the norms more but Hooters starts as in person encounter. It’s already a very different dynamic from lurking online amongst hundreds watching a person knowing they can’t see you.
Rooster326@programming.dev 18 hours ago
I want to add that the Hooters girl can very easily see when it has gone too far, and can call it off when they want to.
The people you’re talking about keep amping up their para social relationship until there is no literal way for them to not snap when they come back to reality When they realize how much money, and their literal lifespan being used.
Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I’m not shocked by any of it. when you sleep with big companies like twitch or Microsoft or Google, expect to get treated like shit. you aren’t important to them, they don’t care about you. make them money and deal with your own problems.
time and time again, these companies clearly show how much they don’t care, yet people keep flocking to them.
stop trusting companies…
thatradomguy@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
The entire thing feels exploitative and gross for everyone involved, both the streamers and the people watching / paying them.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I also don’t like what happened but I am also not surprised. Everyone made a choice and consequences happened.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Exploitation of others is the beating heart of capitalism.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
No argument there.