Valve is a big enough company that they could conceivably start their own payment provider to bypass this.
Comment on Steam Users Rally Behind Anti-Censorship Petition
flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Petitions like this are meaningless unless they come with a viable solution to the duopoly in payment processing that is Visa and Mastercard.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
For example they could sell adult games under credits only and take CC or PayPal for credits.
This way you’re not buying adult titles with CC at all. Same way AAA deal with gambling with lootboxes.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Can’t people do this already? Just load up your Steam Wallet, and then use those funds however you want?
Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Cant use the steam wallet when they delist the game.
Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
Come on, Gabe. You know you wanna.
smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 weeks ago
You do know what happens to Valve Time any time someone tells Gabe to hurry up, right?
DNS@discuss.online 3 weeks ago
Consumers punting the accountability and responsibility of their demise to the next generation of consumers. I hate how feeble and weak willed we are all as a species.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
You’re missing the point. This is not aimed at Valve, but at Visa and MasterCard. They are businesses. They primarily care about profit, not censorship. Especially when that pisses people off. They made the mistake of listening to the vocal minority of Collective Shout, so we have to let them know that. This isn’t the 80’s anymore, gaming is mainstream and there are far, far more gamers than puritanical Quakers that get the vapors at the sight of anything mature or complicated. And worst-case scenario, they are not the only payment processors, just your most convenient ones for customers and businesses. For now…
Gladaed@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Are you calling them Quakers as a derogatory slur or are they actually Quakers/Religious Society of Friends people.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
A “slur”? No. But I was referring to the overly strict, hair-splitting kind of religious extremism that adheres to the letter of the law, not the spirit/intent.
Gladaed@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
So yes, you did. Quakers (used to be) quite progressive.
ulterno@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
I don’t get either of those contexts.
When I read “Quakers”, I just recalled Quake III Arena and thought, “that doesn’t fit”.
Gladaed@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Quakers were some anti authority religious minority (Christian) in Scotland/England. They were notorious for their lack of respect. E.g. used “thy” instead of the formal you. (English changed since then and the informal thy fell out of use)
Gladaed@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
I do still wait for an answer.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
It was 3 in the morning here. Relax.