I never would have guessed that Musk is a billion times worse than Lex Luthor, but the math is right there. Terrible.
spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 year ago
When no-one was looking, Elon Musk lost forty billion. He lost 40 billion. That’s as many as four tens billions. And that’s terrible.
MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 1 year ago
TheGreatFox@lemm.ee 1 year ago
octoperson@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Lex Luthor bought a company for 44 dollars then lost 40?
shiro@artemis.camp 1 year ago
Thanks for making my day!!
gregorum@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Terrible for him. Great for everyone else that that 40 billion is now in the hands of other people. 
NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 year ago
That's not really how that works. He just reduced the value of the site. He nuked value out of existence.
Fraylor@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I mean he did spend 44 billion prior to said nuking. Site isn’t worth as much now sure, but the volume of currency still traveled into the hands of others.
elvith@feddit.de 1 year ago
But he hasn’t realized his losses yet - HODL!
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Twitter having overwhelming dominance may have had value to shareholders, but IMO that is at the expense of everyone else. Not having to use Twitter is valuable.
superkret@feddit.de 1 year ago
Terrible for him
Not really, and that’s the obscene part. Literally absolutely nothing changed about his standard of living by losing $40B.
He could have solved world hunger for years with that money, and wouldn’t even have had to give anything up for it.qaz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
40 billion going into the bank accounts of investors that previously owned Twitter stock certainly is a redistribution of wealth, but I doubt it’s the kind you’re referring to.
spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Depends what they do with it, I guess.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
He could have ended world hunger multiple times. But instead he bought a social media site so he could be popular with the Nazi crowd.
On the bright side, whenever anyone fucks things up now, they can think “well at least at least I didn’t fuck things up as badly as Elon Musk.”
elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 year ago
40,000 millions. Most people could live without working ever again with one million dollars (provided they managed them wisely.)
StinkyRedMan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
While one million is a pretty good amount of cash, you’re delusional if you thinks it’s a “never working again” amount of money. I had this talk pretty recently with a friend of mine, if he used it to finish paying his house (150k) at 24k a year it would not even last 40 years.
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 year ago
At a 4% return, a million nets you 4000/month without affecting the principle. 48k/yr. Even post taxes, that’s around 40k.
Plently of places in the US you can live for 40k/yr. Not luxury, but if youre fine with rural to semi rural, you can do well on interest alone.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re assuming that everyone living today will live for more than 40 years. Ageist much? (I’m kidding.)
No, I’m not delusional. I’m not saying “never work again and live in luxury.” I’ll gladly live in a studio apartment for a few years while I put some of that money work for me (instead of me working.) It’s doable.
Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Last time I looked into it, it was closer to 4 million to “never work again” if you were in your mid-30s. Nowadays, even that figure is probably not enough. Your point still stands, however.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Let’s run an experiment. Someone give me 1 million dollars, post-taxes, and I’ll try my best to never work again. Any takers?
DLSchichtl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean, we were all looking. We’ve been enjoying mountains of popcorn to twitters slow collapse.