“charity”
Comment on Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates Meet for the First Time Ever
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks agoGates is still very active in his charity organization
farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Comment on Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates Meet for the First Time Ever
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks agoGates is still very active in his charity organization
“charity”
Valmond@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Making money/influence. It’s such a scam his “Bill and Melinda Charity” (no taxes on charities).
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Valmond@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Their pr firm seems to function very well at least.
Guess you’re going to whitewash bezos, musk and zuckerberg next?
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Lol no. Of all the sleazy and greasy millionaires, Gates is one of the few whose actions speaks for themselves. Dude has been doing noble causes for most of my life.
I’m all for talking shit about the rich, but it better be true.
Valmond@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Name one bad historical person that didn’t do at least some good.
Your moral compass is broken.
Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
The charity did more than some good though.
victorz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s still giving money away though? Why would you want there to be taxes on charity?
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
It’s more nuanced though. Here’s how rich people use charities to gain wealth:
Rich person has tons of money that would be taxed if bill Y passes. Rich person creates a charity and donated 20% of what they would had to pay to the IRS to the charity, with that money the charity uses half for good causes and half is given to X lobby company, which then lobbies politicians to avoid passing that bill.
In the end, the rich person saved 80% of what they would had to pay.
Yeah, 10% went to good causes but imagine what the society could afford if 100% went through instead of 0.
This is a very rough outline of how they do it, but the summary is that they use charities to donate to lobbies while skipping taxes on the donation itself.
binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
It’s the US, so more weapons I presume.
Allero@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
The point here is that in many jurisdictions doing charity exempts you from certain taxes, and it is possible to shuffle money around under the disguise of philanthropy while still getting all the financial benefits like an actual charity
victorz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Well that’s disgusting, ain’t it. 🫤
Valmond@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Amen
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Because they are tax avoidance mechanism first and charity seconds.
Money is a brokering system of power, charitues being tax free makes these entities unaccountable to democratic institurions.
That’s how we ended up with this infection of corrupt megachurches.
The “prosperity gospel” is billionaire-serving propaganda. It empowers their formation, growth and necessary abuses that come from such widespread exploitation.
victorz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Gotcha. That sounds very bad indeed.
Valmond@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Giving away money? You sweet summer child.
Research don’t want “his” (the foundations) money, it comes with so many strings attached all your lives work now belongs to the B&M foundation.
victorz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Alright dude, I don’t know much about the foundation, sorry. 🤷♂️
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Search the web for “polio”
floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
en.wikipedia.org/…/Global_Polio_Eradication_Initi…
Slovene@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
Google en passant.
dan@upvote.au 3 weeks ago
What type of taxes are you talking about?