victorz
@victorz@lemmy.world
- Comment on New social experiment 13 hours ago:
asian_big-uns/
- Comment on New social experiment 13 hours ago:
permission denied - Comment on New social experiment 14 hours ago:
Good. French kids are always extra toxic online. Someone toxic in Rocket League? Usually French.
- Comment on New social experiment 14 hours ago:
ggdG:wq😈
- Comment on SAD 1 day ago:
I’m thankful for you sharing this personal experience, thank you very much. I hope this serves to normalize asexuality for anyone reading. I had nothing against asexuality to begin with of course, but I still learned something today. Again, thanks. All the best to you!
- Comment on SAD 1 day ago:
What?
- Comment on SAD 1 day ago:
Thank you for that. So for you personally, have you ever gotten horny before you stopped getting horny? And do you nowadays find yourself having the same kind of intense feeling about something else than sexual desire? Like food or drink, or doing something else? Is there a substitute, I guess is what I’m asking.
- Comment on SAD 2 days ago:
Question you obviously don’t need to answer: do you never get horny?
- Comment on why does everyone i know treat me like a child or if i was a very childlike person?? 2 days ago:
Oh boy, that “to’ve” seemed so pretentious given the context of what you’re saying. 😆
- Comment on If we eat three meals a day, why do we poop only once? 2 days ago:
Oh… God…
- Comment on If we eat three meals a day, why do we poop only once? 2 days ago:
Imagine the dump saved up for 40 years. The relief. Hnnng.
- Comment on If we eat three meals a day, why do we poop only once? 2 days ago:
Your colon can be a LIFO depending on which end you are putting things into it. 😏
- Comment on If we eat three meals a day, why do we poop only once? 2 days ago:
Everybody gets one.
- Comment on What's Mastodon precious? 1 month ago:
What’s wrong with Bluesky? From my perspective it looks pretty dang wholesome. Could someone please elaborate?
- Comment on Most file types are just a renamed .zip 2 months ago:
Oh dear God
- Comment on Most file types are just a renamed .zip 2 months ago:
Thank God they went with file name extensions so we didn’t have to preface every source .txt file with header content to instruct the editor about what kind of content it would have.
- Comment on Dormice 2 months ago:
I love the immediate “a-and”. But I read it as a confident “aaand…” which I think is way funnier.
- Comment on Flipboard is going to let you follow fediverse accounts right inside the app 4 months ago:
I just use Lemmy. Follow the right communities and I don’t feel like I’m in the dark in any way.
- Comment on Flipboard is going to let you follow fediverse accounts right inside the app 4 months ago:
Indeed, not that difficult.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
I think we’re talking past each other here. Missing each other’s points. I’m definitely confused by yours, and I feel like I’m not getting across to you. So I think I’ll say thank you for the discussion, and I’m sorry.
Just know this: I’m on board with everyone saying it would be good if AMD patched this for everyone. 🙂
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
But the airbag situation is different. The airbag vulnerability is something broken which already doesn’t work on the car. It’s broken before and after the crash.
But as I understood it, this vulnerability is only exploitable after the system has been compromised in some other way, first. So your system would have to first be compromised, then this vulnerability is exploitable. That’s like saying "your car radio will not function in this car, but only after the engine breaks. It’s like 🤷♂️ OK.
But the really bad thing IMO is that this vulnerability can cause permanent damage once exploited (?). That is super, super bad.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
I haven’t had malware on any of my computers for 20+ years. 🤷♂️ Ever since I stopped clicking on shitty links on shitty sites and downloading shitty files with unknown contents and such behavior. I don’t think I’m worried. I’m not the target group for these kinds of attacks, I think.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
I mean… 🤷♂️ The analysis is made, decision made. I probably have an affected system but… What’s the real risk for private end users? Should I really be so concerned?
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
they could just as well choose to help them.
I think that’s what I have a hard time believing. If they could “just as well” help, it is my belief that they also would. Because I don’t think they’re morons. I think they know this hurts their reputation. There has to be some obstacle, be it financial or lack of man power or… something. That is my belief.
Don’t you (all) think that sounds more likely than them just leaving their customers in the dark for no other reason than not having to do work?
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
What I meant was exactly that, which you corroborated as correct. You’d first have to already compromise these systems, as well as exploit this vulnerability.
Gosh, it’s not easy getting my point across here today, I’m sorry.
All I’m saying is that I don’t think AMD is doing this to us, on purpose. I think it’s just happened, and they’re not handling it very well, even though it’s somewhat understandable. At least to me. 🤷♂️
But then again, I have no reason to be attacked or have my system compromised, so my situation is better than others’, perhaps.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
I agree. 👌
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
When I said “It’s like”, I meant it as a simile to what’s going on with AMD right now. Not with what’s actually going on with car companies. Car companies are a whole different topic and discussion, of which I don’t know nothing.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
Would a car have a defect that was shown 5 years later, then the manufacturer would have to recall it or offer a repair program and or money in exchange.
I mean… A car is different, depending on the defect. It’s like “this window only breaks if you’ve already crashed the car”. (The defect only causes a vulnerability if the system is already compromised AFAICT.) And 5 years is much, much younger for a car compared to a CPU, but that’s not the important bit, I know.
But I agree with you all, I am not saying it shouldn’t be fixed, I was just saying I don’t think AMD is looking to screw over their customers on purpose. That’s all.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
Ryzen 3000 series CPUs are still sold as new
Ah, that changes things. Not great. But still,
uninfected systems will intentionally be left vulnerable
what I meant was that apparently only compromised systems are vulnerable to this defect.
- Comment on AMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose' 4 months ago:
I’m guessing it’s a balance between old products, effort, severity, etc. As we’ve learned, this is only an issue for an already infected system. 🤷♂️