As someone who dislikes traditional low flow heads that tend to icepick you with little streams, I highly recommend high sierra showerheads. I don’t know how they pull it off, but it absolutely blasts you with water while still being low flow. Like I prefer it to any other shower head I’ve tried, low flow or not.
They make one with an adjustable valve that let’s you dial in the perfect amount of flow too.
comador@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
I always get downvoted for saying it, but I don’t care because the real water savings never came from stupid showers:
Most low flow shower heads have a plastic insert in them called a restrictor that can be removed to make it work like the high flow ones.
It’s nothing more than a small cylinder that can be pushed or pulled out from the shower line and manufacturers use these restrictors because it allows them to sell the same unit in multiple markets.
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
I had to come back here specifically to thank you.
We have a “rainfall” showerhead that has been a huge disappointment since we installed it. Your comment popped into my head today as I was about to jump in the shower. All I had to do was remove a little o-ring and now it works fantastic! It also cut my shower time in half.
Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Not that I disagree, but good ones DO have a different system in place. They take in air, to make the drops bigger and it feels like there’s more water being spread out. Doesn’t help with the pressure complaint, but it does really help IMO!
And that does save you money because less energy is used to heat up water.
tal@lemmy.today 15 hours ago
Another factor is that your shower water is very probably — unless you have some sort of gray-water irrigation system going on or something — heading to a sewage treatment plant, and if we wanted to do so, we can purify the water there, make that closed loop and feed back into the water supply, recover basically all the water from treatment.
The UK does it:
washingtonpost.com/…/uk-drink-sewage-water-squeam…
California and some other states are doing it:
pbs.org/…/california-is-set-to-become-2nd-state-t…
Plus, in California and a lot of other places, we can (and do) desalinate water.
www.sdcwa.org/…/seawater-desalination/
It costs more than pulling from a river, and that’s economically-difficult for agriculture…but it’s just not prohibitive for residential use, and there’s a whole ocean of water out there.
www.sdcwa.org/wp-content/…/desal-carlsbad-fs.pdf
An acre-foot of water will, depending upon where in the country you are — usage levels vary by area — supply about one to four households for a year at average usage. And that price is in California; electricity is a major input to desalination, and California has some of the highest electricity prices in the US, generally second only to Hawaii and something like double most of the country.
Eheran@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
No idea at what point you talk about where the real savings actually come from, but not anywhere after that colon.
catloaf@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
It comes from not using huge amounts of water to grow water-intenaive crops in the California desert.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
And reducing grass in desert areas.
comador@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
This.
comador@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Yup, I screwed up and forgot to add it. Edited it and did so.